UPDATE 2-Accused 9/11 plotter likely to face execution

Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:25am EST

Related Topics

* Gibbs has no comment on moving trial from New York

* Republican says they will deny funds for New York trial (Updates with Axelrod quote, more background)

By Alan Elsner

WASHINGTON, Jan 31 (Reuters) - Accused Sept. 11 plotter Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will be tried and convicted and is likely to be executed, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said on Sunday.

Interviewed on CNN's "State of the Union," show, Gibbs said: "Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is going to meet justice and he's going to meet his maker. He will be brought to justice and he's likely to be executed for the heinous crimes he committed."

Gibbs did not confirm reports that the Obama administration has begun looking for places other than the heart of New York City to prosecute self-professed mastermind Mohammed and four accused co-conspirators in the face of fierce criticism tied to security and costs.

"We are talking with the authorities in New York. We understand their logistical concerns," Gibbs said. "We will work with them and come to a solution that we think will bring about justice."

Appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press," senior White House adviser David Axelrod said President Barack Obama still wanted Mohammed and the other Sept. 11 defendants to be tried in the U.S. justice system.

"The president believes we need to take into consideration what the local authorities are saying. But he also believes this: He believes that we ought to bring Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and all others who are involved in terrorist acts to justice, swift and sure, in the American justice system."

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder decided in November the trials would be held in New York, where the federal courthouse is connected to a fortified detention center with a tunnel.

But U.S. officials said last week Holder has begun considering other venues.

Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell, also on CNN, said the accused plotters should be tried by a military commission, preferably at the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. He said Republicans would deny the administration the funding to mount a trial in New York and predicted that many Democrats would join them.

"Interrogate them, detain them and try them in a military commission offshore at Guantanamo," McConnell said.

Obama promised to close the Guantanamo prison, which became a focus of anti-American feeling worldwide, within a year of taking office, a pledge he failed to meet. The administration now plans to transfer some of its remaining 192 prisoners to a state prison it hopes to acquire in Illinois.

The decision to reconsider the location of the Mohammed trial came as Obama faced increased political pressure to refocus his agenda. Obama has been trying to push through a health care reform initiative and reduce high unemployment.


Last week, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg reversed his support for holding the trials in Manhattan.

"I can tell you I would prefer if it was done elsewhere. I think some of the suggestions make sense, like a military base, because it's far away from people and you can provide security easily," Bloomberg said.

Democratic Senator Evan Bayh of Indiana told "Fox News Sunday" it would be hard to justify having the trials in New York because of the cost alone.

"I think this is one of those things that sounded good in theory, but in practice doesn't work so well," he said.

In addition to security concerns, some lawmakers -- as well as some relatives of the almost 3,000 people who were killed in the 2001 attacks on New York and Washington -- have said the defendants could use the criminal courts as soapboxes to propagate their anti-American beliefs and turn the trials into a media circus.

In one previous trial connected to the hijacked plane attacks, Zacarias Moussaoui was sentenced to life in prison in 2006 after being convicted of conspiracy. The trial was in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Alexandria. (Editing by Doina Chiacu)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (19)
BillDShroyer wrote:
Whoah, horsie – this is very risky language coming from Mr. Gibbs. In no small number of news stories, the first thing I see him quoted as saying is that he defendand _will_ meet his maker – right after stating that he has yet to be tried.

While the chances are good that it’s true, a top official to the President should not be making such comments. It leaves no uncertain impression that the accused will not be receiving a fair trial, period. I certainly can see why one would feel justified in making such statements, but they shouldn’t come from someone so high up. It makes our judicial system look as rigged & unjust as any of the terrorist-sponsoring countries we so often decry.

I hope, if the accused is guilty, that he faces our country’s stiffest penalty. I don’t like the Death Penalty, but if we condemn anyone to death for anything, it should be the one guilty of the crimes of which the accused is charged.

Jan 31, 2010 10:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
Dutra wrote:
Gibbs should be slapping tambourines and dancing circles around his organ grinder. This affair has taken on the look of a judicial circus. I smell pardons and commutations in ring three.

Jan 31, 2010 10:40am EST  --  Report as abuse
annemike1 wrote:
yes, hello, Mr. Gibbs seems to think this is a totalitarian state. here the system works as follows: one is presumed innocent until tried and found guilty by the U.S. system of justice. Or is that too a casualty of our global war on terror.

Jan 31, 2010 10:40am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.