Lack of "excellent" coffee blends: Consumer Reports

Related Topics

A waiter carries two cups of Turkish coffee at a coffee shop in Istanbul October 19, 2007. REUTERS/Osman Orsal

A waiter carries two cups of Turkish coffee at a coffee shop in Istanbul October 19, 2007.

Credit: Reuters/Osman Orsal

NEW YORK | Tue Feb 2, 2010 7:36am EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - After tasting 37 different blended coffees, Consumer Reports couldn't find one that measured up to its "excellent" or "very good" ratings, the publication said Tuesday.

The less-than-glowing report follows a year that saw tight supplies of high-quality arabica coffee beans in Colombia, followed by steep premiums that caused some roasters to look for cheaper and more available options for their blends.

Ranking at the top of the list of 14 caffeinated blends -- earning a rating of "good" -- are the Starbucks House Blend, calculated at 26 cents per cup, and Green Mountain Signature Nantucket Blend Medium Roast, at 23 cents per cup.

Blends are the best-selling type of ground coffee and contain beans from at least two regions or countries, the publication said.

The highest score for the 13 decaffeinated coffees also failed to reach the top two categories. The better scoring varieties included Allegro Organic Decaf, Blend Medium Dark, Peet's Decaf House Blend, Caribou Daybreak Coffee Morning Blend Decaf and Bucks County Decaf Breakfast blend.

Consumer Reports has a rating criteria in which the tasters look for specific characteristics including the flavor and aroma.

The publication advised coffee drinkers not to count on familiar brand names or expensive price tags, noting that the cost doesn't accurately reflect the cost per cup due to varying grind densities, and recommended ratios of coffee to water.

Consumer Reports is published by Consumers Union, an independent nonprofit organization that does not accept outside advertising or free test samples, it said in a release.

Full results of the coffee ratings will be available in the March issue of Consumer Reports and online at www.ConsumerReports.org.

(Reporting by Marcy Nicholson; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
THeRmoNukE wrote:
Yuban.

Feb 02, 2010 11:01am EST  --  Report as abuse
GSHart wrote:
Quality continues to diminished in every area of American commerce. Faster and cheaper is not better, just faster and cheaper. Yuban is our choice too.

Europe and Asia have much better coffee that we cannot get here, and they laugh at what we drink here. My son-in-law brings us incredible coffee from Brazil that is not available here in the states either.

Feb 02, 2010 12:09pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Figgins wrote:
This story is almost pointless. Roasting has much more to do with how a coffee tastes, than whether the coffee is a blend or from a single source of beans.

If you really wanted to compare “apples to apples”, then you would need to compare each bean with the same roast.

The one part I do agree with is that cost is not a major factor in taste.

Feb 02, 2010 12:14pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.