U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Starting spoonfeeding later may trim obesity risk

Related News

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Tue Feb 2, 2010 1:42pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Waiting longer to start infants on solid food could make for slimmer adults, new research shows.

"The later you introduce complementary feeding to an infant, within the range of 2 to 6 months, the smaller is the risk that the infant will be overweight as adult," Dr. Kim Fleischer Michaelsen of the University of Copenhagen, one of the researchers on the study, told Reuters Health via E-mail.

Some studies have suggested that breastfeeding protects against obesity, although the data are not yet conclusive. The World Health Organization and American Academy of Pediatrics currently recommend that babies be breastfed exclusively until six months of age, and advise against introducing solid foods until then. But many parents start their children on solid foods earlier.

Michaelsen and his team looked at a sample of 5,068 men and women born in Copenhagen between 1959 and 1961. At that time, Michaelsen noted, parents were instructed to start giving their infant solid foods between four to six months of age, but many started sooner.

Half of the study participants were breastfed for at least two and a half months, while half started eating solid food at three and a half months of age or later. Seventeen percent of the babies started spoon feeding before two months of age, while 46 percent didn't start until they were four months old or later.

At age one, babies who were breastfed for longer had lower body mass indexes -- BMIs, standard measures used to gauge how fat or thin a person is. However, there was no association between duration of nursing and BMI in later childhood, adolescence or adulthood.

The researchers did find that the age at which parents introduced various types of foods to an infant did seem to have an effect on BMI in adulthood. "In our study the risk of overweight at age 42 years was reduced by 5 percent to 10 percent for each month introduction of complementary foods was delayed," Michaelsen explained.

"I think it is best to wait with complementary foods until the infant is about 6 months old," he added. "But there is no reason to be too rigid about the age. Some infants will need complementary foods before the age of 6 months, but they should not get them before four months of age."

SOURCE: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, online December 24, 2009.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
greymare wrote:
I am not even going to read this idiotic article because it is so blind. And the big word here MAY. It DOES NOT mean that what this person HAS TO say is the bible truth. Truth is, from the time we are born our family genes will decide pretty much what SHAPE we will be. It is just like everything else that we know about ourselves and why DOCTORS ALWAYS ASK WHAT RUNS IN YOUR FAMILY. YEARS AGO we fed our children pretty much whenever we felt that they could digest their food which was about 4 weeks and up and MOST OF US NEVER HAD OBESE CHIILDREN. We ate potatoes with gravy, meat with gravy, fries with gravy, etc.etc. BUT we also used to go OUTSIDE TO PLAY and we used to do a lot of running around. The trouble with ALL THESE RESEACHERS told – they NEVER take family history or hereidty into account when they do these studies. Studies really are just one way for these people to make work for themselves and end up costing the taxpayer more money in healthcare costs. MAY – not for sure, for sure – so who cares – they all bend the truth to make it sound so good. Usually, life is more complicated than what these studies come up with just like predicting the weather. It will NEVER HAPPEN.

Feb 02, 2010 1:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.