Cable rivals: Comcast/NBC deal threatens consumers

Tue Feb 2, 2010 7:26pm EST

* Cable association says Comcast, NBC deal bad for viewers

* Affiliates worry about access to best shows

* Comcast, NBCU say joint venture is pro-consumer

WASHINGTON, Feb 2 (Reuters) - Comcast's (CMCSA.O) plan for a joint venture with NBC Universal threatens consumers, and possible remedies could be rendered "meaningless," a member of the American Cable Association's board will tell a congressional panel on Thursday.

"This is an unprecedented deal, which, if consummated, would substantially increase the market power of Comcast, threatening consumer and competition in the traditional and the rapidly evolving Internet content and distribution areas," according to written testimony from Colleen Abdoulah, president of WOW!, which competes with Comcast in Chicago and Detroit.

"Comcast has proven itself particularly adept at weakening or even rendering meaningless any such relief," according to her testimony.

A copy of her testimony and others' was obtained by Reuters.

Abdoulah -- perhaps mindful of the belief in the Washington antitrust community that the Justice Department declined to challenge the Ticketmaster/Live Nation deal because of the difficulty of challenging deals in the same supply chain -- sought to portray the joint venture of Comcast, the top U.S. cable provider, and NBC Universal as a deal between rivals.

"The deal greatly increases horizontal concentration by effectively combining key content assets from the two firms, as well as important distribution assets," according to her testimony, prepared for a subcommittee of the Energy and Commerce Committee.

In other testimony, affiliates of NBC Universal said they were pleased with reassuring statements from Comcast and NBC about supporting free television but they were looking for solid commitments to back them up, Michael Fiorile, chair of the NBC Television Affiliates Board, will tell the congressional panel.

Affiliates' concerns focus on whether Comcast will have the incentive to invest in and offer the best shows -- such as "30 Rock" -- to NBC affiliates and whether they would be offered to cable stations or streaming video sites.

Comcast is the No. 1 U.S. residential Internet service provider and NBC owns a third of Hulu.com, the most popular U.S. website for viewing TV shows

Comcast and NBC's assurances have "been a very welcome start to this process," according to a text of Fiorile's testimony.

"Our discussions with Comcast, however, have just begun, and we must now progress beyond general statements of intent. In the weeks ahead, the affiliates board and Comcast have much hard work before them to reach clear, specific, documented and enforceable conditions defining what it means in practice for the new Comcast-controlled NBC to be 'committed' to the network-affiliate model."

In joint testimony, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts and Jeff Zucker, president of NBC Universal, argued that the deal would be good for consumers and would encourage innovation and investment.

"Comcast and NBCU have publicly affirmed their continuing commitment to free, over-the-air broadcasting. Despite a challenging business and technological environment, the proposed transaction has significant potential to invigorate NBCU's broadcasting business and expand the important public interest benefits it provides to consumers across this country," according to their testimony.

The joint venture must be approved by the Federal Communications Commission and the Justice Department's antitrust division.

Under the terms of the deal, Comcast would get 51 percent of a new joint venture that includes NBC Universal, valued at $30 billion, and Comcast's own cable networks, valued at $7.25 billion. GE would own the remaining 49 percent. As payment for its stake, Comcast will contribute $6.5 billion in cash and its cable networks. (Reporting by Diane Bartz and John Poirier; Editing by Gary Hill)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
gtschnauzer wrote:
In today’s economy, I think it deplorable that Hulu would want to start charging. I pay almost $500 a year for DSL and to ask us to pay an additional fee to use Hulu is outrageous. This would set a disastrous precedent. The NY Times is also considering charging for online news. Both of these would loose millions of viewers. Stores, theaters, Operas, Symphonies, restaurants, etc., etc., etc. and they have the gall to want us to pay additionally to watch someting on Hulu. My answer is NO. I would do it. That is just greed.

Feb 02, 2010 9:06pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.