Sponsored Links

Pay czar says AIG bonus flap to end in March

WASHINGTON | Wed Feb 3, 2010 8:40am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's pay czar on Wednesday predicted the issue of hefty bonuses for AIG (AIG.N) employees would end in March and denied a Republican claim that the firm outmaneuvered the Obama administration.

"It ends this March with the last of these retention payments. These are the old grandfathered payments," pay czar Kenneth Feinberg told ABC's "Good Morning America" program. "Another month or so, these old, guaranteed bonuses will be a thing of the past."

American International Group Inc, which was bailed out with a $182.3 billion U.S. aid package, is expected to pay out another round of employee bonuses on Wednesday worth about $100 million, according to the Washington Post.

The payout is part of a previously known $195 million award that was due to employees of the AIG Financial Products unit.

The latest awards have drawn fire from Republicans in Congress, including Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, who said AIG "outmaneuvered" the Obama administration and now has taxpayers "over a barrel."

Feinberg firmly denied the accusation.

"We are not being outmaneuvered," he said. "These AIG bonuses were signed into law years ago. What I'm trying to do now is maximize whatever leverage we have to get as much of that money back and -- to use Senator Grassley's word -- to maneuver AIG to pay back what it said it would pay back."

Feinberg said AIG was "working hard to try and reduce the size of these bonuses" while moving to repay $45 million in previous bonus payments.

"It's a lot of money. It is understandably frustrating. But understand what AIG is at least trying to do, this new regime at AIG," Feinberg said.

"Thirty-nine million of that $45 million is being returned to the Treasury and to the taxpayer. There's still $6.7 (to) $7 million to go, but we are insisting that money be repaid," he told ABC.

"We've got to work as best we can to get as much of this money back as we can. And frankly, we're doing a very very good job I think in getting as much of this money back as we can pursuant to the rule of law."

(Reporting by David Morgan, editing by Maureen Bavdek)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
DragXraceR wrote:
If the US Gov had not bailed out AIG, then AIG would have gone belly up and those “Retention” payments would have been null and void. The mistake the US Gov made was aloowing AIG to continue to business as usual and not to require AIG to operate as if it just had filed bankruptcy. Once again, our loss is AIG’s gain. (Anyone know where my bonus is for this year?)

Feb 03, 2010 2:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Nik12 wrote:
The fact that theses are old contracts is a “crock”. The company I work for went bankrupt and anyone who had a retention bonus contract got screwed because the company just simply made the decision to not pay the contract and rescinded it. Period… end of discussion. AIG could just say… NO.

Feb 03, 2010 4:22pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.