Jobless claims rise, productivity stays high

Related Topics

Brokers trade over the phone on the dealing floor at ICAP in Jersey City, New Jersey December 9, 2009. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Brokers trade over the phone on the dealing floor at ICAP in Jersey City, New Jersey December 9, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

WASHINGTON | Thu Feb 4, 2010 4:53pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The number of U.S. workers filing for jobless benefits unexpectedly rose last week, but another big gain in productivity in the fourth quarter offered hope that companies were closer to adding to payrolls.

Initial claims for state unemployment insurance increased 8,000 to 480,000, the Labor Department said on Thursday. Financial markets had expected claims to come in at 460,000.

While claims are down sharply from their peak last spring, the improvement has stalled in recent weeks. Despite the setback, analysts are optimistic hiring will pick up soon as firms run out of ways to boost output without new workers.

Business productivity grew at a 6.2 percent rate in the fourth quarter as employers ramped up that quarter's output at the fastest pace in six years and kept a tight lid on hiring, another Labor Department report showed.

Economists had expected productivity, which measures the hourly output per worker, to rise at a 6.0 percent rate after gaining 7.2 percent in the third quarter. In the second quarter, productivity had risen 6.9 percent.

"The fact that we have had three such extremely strong quarters of productivity in a row suggests it has to stop," said Bill Cheney, chief economist at John Hancock Financial Services in Boston.

"I am fairly convinced we are going to see an upturn in employment because employers simply won't be able to maintain any growth in sales without hiring additional bodies," he said.

Similar sentiments were echoed by U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. "I think that there is encouragement in that, but we have a long way to go," he told the Senate Budget Committee.

STOCKS TUMBLE ON CLAIMS

Investors, however, frowned at the rise in jobless claims. U.S. stocks ended sharply lower, also pressured by mounting sovereign debt problems in Europe.

U.S. government debt prices rallied as bonds attracted a flight-to-quality bid, while the dollar soared against the euro.

Job creation is seen as President Barack Obama's most pressing priority. Anxiety over a 10-percent unemployment rate may have cost Obama's Democrats a crucial Senate seat last month and threatens big losses for the party in the November congressional elections.

Obama lunched with top business executives on Thursday to discuss the economy and job creation and Democratic leaders in the Senate unveiled a proposal that they hope will help bring down the jobless rate.

High unemployment has curtailed consumer spending, but the worst of the retrenchment appears to be done. Major retail chains reported higher January sales compared with a year earlier, when the recession was at its deepest point, and monthly job losses soared to 741,000.

The government will release its closely-watched employment report for January 2010 on Friday. A Reuters survey predicted nonfarm payrolls grew 5,000 after a surprise 85,000 drop in December. The unemployment rate, however, is expected to edge up to 10.1 percent in January from 10 percent.

Median forecasts from the top 20 forecasters saw payrolls unchanged last month.

Productivity has grown for five straight quarters as employers slashed costs, mostly by cutting jobs, to cope with the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. In 2009, productivity grew 2.9 percent, the biggest annual rise in six years.

The big productivity gains allowed businesses to ramp up output in the second half of the year, even as they were letting employees go. In the fourth quarter, the economy grew at a 5.7 percent annual pace, also its fastest clip in six years.

That recovery was underscored by a report on Thursday that showed an unexpected surge in orders received by U.S. factories and a drop in inventories in December.

The productivity report showed non-farm output grew at a 7.2 percent rate in the final three months of 2009, the fastest pace since the third quarter of 2003.

Hours worked rose at a 1.0 percent rate, the first increase since the second quarter of 2007 and the fastest since the fourth quarter of 2006. Some economists said that was another sign businesses might need to start hiring soon.

Unit labor costs, a gauge of inflation and profit pressures closely watched by the Federal Reserve, fell a steeper than expected 4.4 percent after declining 1.5 percent in the third quarter, pointing to scant wage-related pressures.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
CJsmitty wrote:
Ok folks , let’s stop playing games with the definitions here. Any layoffs that result in a net number of unemployed that was higher than before,is an INCREASE in unemployment. It doesn’t matter if that number is lower than the week before. We can’t say “initial unemployment claims fell by blah, blah, blah. Fell from what? Any initial unemployment claim that is not negated by a hire is an INCREASE.

Feb 04, 2010 10:57am EST  --  Report as abuse
jstaf wrote:
The more interesting issue is not the latest conspiracy theory or comment on the “way” the numbers should be, but rather the increasing productivity.

I know some of this is because there are less workers but the real issue is that an employer can get the work done with less people.

A 7% annual productivity gain means that we need half as many workers to do the same amount of output every ten years.

That is a problem that isn’t mentioned in these debates because it points out the uncomfortable fact that we have way more people that our current economy to absorb.

Feb 04, 2010 11:37am EST  --  Report as abuse
Anna123 wrote:
They may be getting the work done with less people who work 14 hour days for no extra pay.
Unfortunately people will not stay at these companies and will move on to better jobs.
Being unemployed is much better than being a slave.

Feb 04, 2010 5:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.