Ukraine awaits Tymoshenko concession or legal fight

Related Topics

1 of 10. Supporters of presidential candidate Viktor Yanukovich celebrate his victory in a presidential run-off vote during a rally in front of Ukraine's central electoral commission in Kiev, February 8, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Vasily Fedosenko

KIEV | Mon Feb 8, 2010 6:28pm EST

KIEV (Reuters) - Ukraine waited for Yulia Tymoshenko Tuesday to contest a weekend presidential election or concede defeat and allow the winner, Viktor Yanukovich, to start piecing together a governing coalition in parliament.

Prime Minister Tymoshenko, the co-architect of the Orange Revolution that denied Yanukovich the presidency in 2004 after a rigged election, was due to give a news conference Tuesday.

She has so far ignored calls by international monitors to accept defeat and shake hands with the winner, whose election could draw the former Soviet republic back toward Moscow.

There was no mood in the snow-bound capital Kiev for a repeat of the 2004 street protests. But a legal challenge to the narrow margin of victory -- 2.8 percent with 98.4 percent of votes counted -- could deny Ukraine a swift return to stability.

The country of 46 million people has been battered by the economic crisis and badly needs to restart talks with the International Monetary Fund on a $16.4 billion bail-out package derailed by breached promises of fiscal restraint.

Tymoshenko cannot catch up with Yanukovich in the vote-count. Just under 600,000 votes separated the two sides, in a vote that underscored Ukraine's deep divide.

As votes trickled in Sunday evening, the 49-year-old former gas tycoon cried fraud but backed away from an earlier threat to call people out onto the streets.

"The temptation will be there for (Tymoshenko) to make a challenge," said Andrew Wilson, a senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations.

But monitors declared the election an "impressive display" of democracy and urged a peaceful transition of power. There were no serious irregularities, they said.

Western investors and Ukraine's powerful neighbor Russia reacted cautiously to the victory of Yanukovich, whose party is allied to the Kremlin's United Russia.

Prolonged uncertainty over the outcome could further hurt Ukraine's sickly economy and delay the resumption of much-needed bail-out cash from the International Monetary Fund.

The official result signaled a remarkable comeback for Yanukovich, who tapped widespread disillusionment with the Orange Revolution democracy movement that delivered years of infighting instead of prosperity and stability.

A close Yanukovich aide said there were no back-stage contacts with Tymoshenko to strike a deal on a future alliance.

Yanukovich will instead be seeking to forge a coalition to get his own ally into the key role of prime minister, which could require support from the Our Ukraine faction of outgoing President Viktor Yushchenko. That is far from certain.

However, Yanukovich may need only some of the Our Ukraine faction to secure a workable majority.

Failure would force fresh parliamentary polls -- possibly as early as June although autumn is more likely -- but Yanukovich appears reluctant to call fresh polls for fear of voter fatigue.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
v21a wrote:
Its absolutely embarrassing how could a crook, a thief, a felon can run the state! Its absurd! Shes not any better neither. These elections show us how smutty the government system is set up.They all crooks there the whole Verhovna Rada. They all scavengers and rats there and then they talk Democracy!

Feb 08, 2010 8:27am EST  --  Report as abuse
Jezebel wrote:
In the context of the “reset button” being pushed with Russia, we have no idea whom the Ukrainian people really wanted for president — not just in terms of vote counting, but in terms of all the ways the economy, international climate, and media can be manipulated prior to election day.

But then, we have no idea who actually won the Ukrainian presidential election in 2004 either. The West had spent two years preparing the Orange Revolution — shipping in Serbian activists and setting up financing and propaganda apparatuses — and the accusation of fraud was ready to be promulgated one way or another.

Those objective OSCE observers happily pillory a sham of elections in the autarky of Belarus — and then praise nearly identically ridiculous elections in Western-business-friendly Kazakhstan as great strides towards democracy with just a few flaws.

Feb 08, 2010 11:23am EST  --  Report as abuse
dushenko wrote:
While princess Leia and Scarface were living it up and tearing the country apart with their endless bickering and power struggles the Ukrainian people have been paying the price. I think the orange clowns had their chance and I hope the can do what’s best for the country and accept the results. Color revolutions have been a tool financed and coordinated by the US government to destabilize the regions and topple governments they do not see as favorable to US policy agendas. Burry this rotten orange and do what’s right for Ukraine. Hopefully the other color revolutions will suffer the same fate as they have now been exposed for what they really are, nothing more and nothing less than the arm of US war machine or CIA cleverly pulling the strings through social media, NGOs, and well financed political campaigns to get their install their puppet and have their way around the globe.

Feb 08, 2010 3:20pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.