Ancient Greenland gene map has a surprise

Related Topics

1 of 2. Artists Impression of 'Inuk'.

Credit: Reuters/Nuka Godfredsen/Handout

WASHINGTON | Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:51pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Scientists have sequenced the DNA from four frozen hairs of a Greenlander who died 4,000 years ago in a study they say takes genetic technology into several new realms.

Surprisingly, the long-dead man appears to have originated in Siberia and is unrelated to modern Greenlanders, Morten Rasmussen of the University of Copenhagen and colleagues found.

"This provides evidence for a migration from Siberia into the New World some 5,500 years ago, independent of that giving rise to the modern Native Americans and Inuit," the researchers wrote in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature.

Not only can the findings help transform the study of archeology, but they can help answer questions about the origins of modern populations and disease, they said.

"Such studies have the potential to reconstruct not only our genetic and geographical origins, but also what our ancestors looked like," David Lambert and Leon Huynen of Griffith University in Queensland, Australia, wrote in a commentary.

The DNA gives strong hints about the man, nicknamed Inuk. "Brown eyes, brown skin, he had shovel-form front teeth," Eske Willerslev, who oversaw the study, told a telephone briefing. Such teeth are characteristic of East Asian and Native American populations.

He had the genes for early hair loss, too. "Because we found quite a lot of hair from this guy, we presume he actually died quite young," Willerslev said.

The man lived among the Saqqaq people, the earliest known culture in southern Greenland that lasted from around 2500 BC until about 800 BC.

Scientists have disagreed on who these people were -- whether they descended from the peoples who crossed the Bering Strait 30,000 to 40,000 years ago to settle the New World or whether they were more recent immigrants.

Willerslev's team pulled DNA from hairs found in a frozen Saqqaq site and sequenced it just as they would a modern person's full genome, looking for characteristic mutations.

"Recent advances in DNA sequencing technologies have initiated an era of personal genomics," the researchers wrote.

"The sequencing project described here is a direct test of the extent to which ancient genomics can contribute knowledge about now-extinct cultures," they added.

The DNA links Inuk to modern-day Arctic residents of Siberia. He had almost none of the mutations seen in Indians living in Central and South America.

"We have an increasingly powerful forensic tool with which to 'reconstruct' extinct humans and the demographics of populations," Lambert and Huynen wrote.

A year ago scientists sequenced the genome of a Neanderthal -- early humans who went extinct 30,000 years ago -- and other groups have sequenced DNA from dried-out mammoth hair.

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
FlavorD wrote:
Neanderthals WERE NOT EARLY HUMANS. Clearly once again a news agency has given a science story to someone who doesn’t know science. It’s appalling.

YOU’E NOT DESCENDED FROM NEANDERTHALS.

sheesh

Feb 11, 2010 11:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
Permatrip wrote:
Neanderthals were early humans flavorD,I know the bible didnt talk about them,but they did once exsist and they were quite like us. Maybe you should take up some science classes

Sheesh

Feb 11, 2010 12:22pm EST  --  Report as abuse
robert_r wrote:
@FlavorD:

The term “human” comprises the entire genus Homo, going back about 2 million years.

You are confusing “human” with “fully modern Homo sapiens sapiens”.

As to the ancestry of present-day human groups, there are numerous studies showing flaws in the Recent Out of Africa model — certainly the pure form of it in which no mixing whatsoever occurs with other regional populations. The error on the part of the popular media is in fact continuing to repeat the highly politicized, “globalization-friendly” line that all humans are entirely descended from a 50,000 year northeast African population.

Feb 11, 2010 12:40pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.