U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Obama to give nuclear loan guarantee to Southern Co

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:05pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama will announce an $8.3 billion loan guarantee next week for Southern Co to build and operate the first new U.S. nuclear power plant in nearly three decades, an administration official said on Friday.

The financial backing, meant to show Obama's commitment to nuclear energy as he fights to pass a climate change bill through Congress, would go toward two new nuclear reactors at a plant in Burke, Georgia, the official said.

"The president has long believed that nuclear power should be part of our energy mix -- that's why he has advocated for comprehensive energy and climate legislation that leverages all of our energy sources, including nuclear, to transition to a clean energy economy," the official said.

"This is just one step in a process to ensure that nuclear remains a key part of our energy mix."

Obama, a Democrat, has tried to reach out to Republicans who are skeptical about aspects of his proposed energy proposals by emphasizing the role of nuclear power in the country's future energy production.

U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu said last month the process for approving federal loan guarantees for new nuclear power plants has become complicated, but promised the department would issues its first loan deals very soon.

The official said the guarantee to be announced next week stemmed from 2005 legislation authorizing the U.S. government to issue loan guarantees for projects that "avoid, reduce, or sequester air pollutants or greenhouse gas emissions."

"No nuclear loan guarantees have been issued since that legislation was passed," the official said.

"One of Secretary Chu's top priorities have been to expedite the process to allocate the $18.5 billion in existing loan guarantee authority," he said.

Obama's proposed budget for fiscal year 2011 triples loan guarantees for nuclear-power plants to more than $54 billion.

Supporters of nuclear power argue that more reactors will be needed for the United States to tackle global warming effectively because nuclear reactors are a much cleaner energy source than coal-fired power plants, which spew greenhouse gases.

Nuclear power is controversial, however, because of its radioactive waste, which is now stored on site at reactor locations around the country.

Citing information provided by the company, the administration official said the project would generate about 3,000 construction jobs on site and roughly 850 permanent positions to operate the reactors. About 1.4 million people will be served by the power from the facility, he said.

Georgia Power Co, Oglethorpe Power Corp, the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia and the City of Dalton, Georgia, would all be sponsors of the project, the official said.

(Editing by Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
burningsteel wrote:
Nuclear is better than nuclear, but what about thorium? Thorium if harvested properly is supposed to output a lot more energy than uranium with less waste.

http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/12/ff_new_nukes/

Feb 12, 2010 9:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
burningsteel wrote:
Ah, I meant to write “nuclear is better than nothing”.

Feb 12, 2010 11:33pm EST  --  Report as abuse
BHOShatOnUS wrote:
This is Obama’s backhanded way to finance his ecoterroists, who will deplete the funding of the project through litigation using US government funding to press the case against the nuclear plant.

Feb 13, 2010 11:19am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.