The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

EU asks Greece to explain derivatives reports

BRUSSELS | Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:01pm EST

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Union has asked Greece to explain reports that it engaged in derivatives trades with U.S. investment banks that may have allowed it to mask the size of its debt and deficit from EU authorities.

According to the New York Times, one contract in 2001 -- carried out just as Greece was joining Europe's monetary union -- involved Greece selling forward future lottery receipts and airport landing fees in exchange for cash to write down debts.

The deal was treated as a currency trade rather than a loan, according to the newspaper, allowing Greece to hide it from public view while meeting EU deficit limits.

Greece's finance minister, George Papaconstantinou, on Monday dismissed suggestions that his country may have played fast and loose with monetary rules, saying the transactions Greece took part in were permissible at the time.

"The kind of derivatives contracts reported by some newspapers were legal at that time," he told reporters in Brussels. "Greece was not the only country to use them...They were made illegal; we have not used them since then."

The issue has become a focus of attention as Greece has now acknowledged that it has a budget deficit of nearly 13 percent of gross domestic product -- more than four times EU limits -- and a national debt equivalent to 120 percent of GDP.

The fiscal problems have led to pressure on Greek debt in bond markets and weakened the European single currency.

The European Commission, the EU's executive that is responsible for enforcing EU laws, said it had asked Greece to explain what contracts it had engaged in as Eurostat, the EU's statistics agency, had never been informed.

"I want to state that Eurostat was not aware of such transactions," Commission spokesman Amadeu Altafaj told a regular briefing on Monday.

"But I can tell you that Eurostat has indeed, following these reports, already requested the Greek authorities for an explanation by the end of February."

Asked if the derivatives trades that Greece is alleged to have conducted fell within EU budget rules, Altafaj said:

"We need the information on what kind of transactions took place, if they did (take place), and what was the effect on the government accounts of Greece...This is something that we don't have the information (on) yet and we have requested."

TRANSPARENCY

A senior Greek finance ministry official told Reuters that Greece's current debt financing operations were transparent and complied with Eurostat rules.

But Eurostat, which already has profound concerns about the reliability of Greek macroeconomic data, is likely to take a very hard look at exactly what transactions took place and when.

"This is why we are requesting more capacity for Eurostat to indeed to have more thorough and deeper view on these statistics. Reliable statistics are a key issue in management of public finances," Altafaj said.

What Greece appears to have carried out, at least on one occasion, is a currency swap, which Altafaj said would have to be examined to see if it met EU rules.

In particular, Eurostat will assess if underlying exchange rates and interest rates in any swaps were calculated based on observed market rates, which may be necessary for such deals to be considered legitimate, he said.

An article in Risk magazine last week said a deal between Greece and Goldman Sachs (GS.N), completed in 2002, had effectively allowed Greece to borrow about 1 billion euros without adding to its public debt figures, at a time when the size of its borrowing threatened to attract a fine by Brussels.

Risk said such swaps were legal, common at the time, and widely marketed by a number of banks.

Under the deals, a country could reduce the size of the debt on its balance sheet by issuing euro-denominated debt and swapping it into a foreign currency such as dollars, using an artificially weak or off-market euro exchange rate. The debt would be recognized by Eurostat at the market rate, cutting the country's recorded debt burden, although the country would end up paying higher coupons on the debt, Risk said.

Goldman Sachs declined to comment on Monday.

At a meeting later on Monday, euro zone finance ministers were expected to exert more pressure on Greece to implement planned budget deficit cuts. EU leaders pledged last week to help Athens resolve its crisis if needed, but they are still hoping to avoid having to provide concrete aid.

(Editing by Patrick Graham and Andrew Torchia)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
THeRmoNukE wrote:
As Brussels begins shedding non-performers from the union, it is of my opinion that a widly populist anti-american movement, fueled my mistrust over financial instruments and largescale poverty, begins to spread across the EU. Some dangerous and charismatic leader will head the call and, well, let’s just say that I don’t expect Europe to let me down historically.

Feb 15, 2010 10:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
Acetracy wrote:
Goldman and JPM’s derivative business with sovereign states is big, big business. JPM for example is constantly doing huge deals with Latin American central banks.

As we saw with AIG, Lehman, etc. the derivative business is hugely profitable for these investment banks since the counterparty has no idea whether they are getting a good price or not, and usually it is overly beneficial for the short term at the expense of the future. Exactly what lured AIG into hocking itself to Goldman.

The only way to stop this ridiculous risk peddling is to tax the hell out of it. We should have a worldwide tax on all derivative transactions that starts at 80% and goes up. Regulation will not stop these guys. However taxing the profitability away will stop this mess.

Right now the entire bond market is on crack!! Thank you GS and JPM.

Feb 15, 2010 11:13am EST  --  Report as abuse
jstaf wrote:
Securitization has allowed banks to steal the value of hard earned assets through the use of leverage to misrepresent the value of the underlying assets.

Why is is hard to make this illegal, other than the banks owning the Senate?

Feb 15, 2010 2:53pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.