No rights charge against NY police in 50-shot death

Related Topics

A man wears a Sean Bell shirt at a demonstration near New York Police headquarters in lower Manhattan May 7, 2008. REUTERS/Mike Segar

A man wears a Sean Bell shirt at a demonstration near New York Police headquarters in lower Manhattan May 7, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

NEW YORK | Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:32pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Several New York City police officers who killed an unarmed black man in a hail of 50 bullets on his wedding day will not face criminal civil rights charges, the U.S. Justice Department said on Tuesday.

Sean Bell, 23, was killed and two friends injured outside a strip club after his bachelor party in November 2006. His death outraged New York's black community, who contended that no white suspect would have been shot so many times, if at all.

In April 2008, a New York state judge cleared two of the officers of manslaughter and a third of reckless endangerment. Federal authorities then launched a separate investigation that could have brought civil rights charges against the officers.

"After a careful and thorough review, a team of experienced federal prosecutors and FBI agents determined that the evidence was insufficient to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the law enforcement personnel who fired at Bell ... acted willfully," the Justice Department said.

"Accordingly, the investigation into this incident has been closed," it said.

Civil rights leader Al Sharpton, highly critical of the police, said he had spoken to Attorney General Eric Holder on Tuesday and expressed his "extreme disappointment" at the decision.

"Even though two of the three officers in question were black, we will not stop our pursuit of justice in this matter until every measure in the criminal and civil arena has been exhausted. Fifty shots on an unarmed man who engaged in no crime is intolerable," he said in a statement.

On the night of the shooting, the undercover officer who fired first, had followed Bell and his two friends to Bell's car believing they went to fetch a gun to settle a dispute at the strip club. The police officer opened fire after being grazed by the car as Bell attempted to drive away.

Several other officers reached Bell's car after the initial confrontation and said they believed the undercover officer was being fired at from inside the vehicle.

(Reporting by Michelle Nichols, editing by Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Unchained wrote:
This does not happen in Beverly Hills.
Badges do not grant immunity to killers.

Feb 16, 2010 4:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
sniper310 wrote:
Tring to run someone down with your car, is a crime, just in case Al Sharpton doesn’t understand.

Feb 16, 2010 5:09pm EST  --  Report as abuse
pyradius wrote:
Yeah brilliant logic there that examines no details. Hitting someone may be a crime. A plain clothes (undercover) officer jumping at your car with a gun (do YOU know the details?) might alarm anyone into hitting the gas pedal to get away.

Feb 16, 2010 6:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.