China seen allowing stronger yuan in 2010

Related Topics

An employee counts Renminbi banknotes at a Bank of China branch in Changzhi, Shanxi province November 16, 2009. REUTERS/Stringer

An employee counts Renminbi banknotes at a Bank of China branch in Changzhi, Shanxi province November 16, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Stringer

WASHINGTON | Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:09pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Beijing is likely to let its currency begin rising in value again this year in response to growing pressures at home and abroad, two U.S. private sector specialists on China said on Wednesday.

"I think China has been waiting for its exports to resume growth, which they started to do in December. That, I think, gives them the domestic cover they need to resume (a) gradual appreciation," John Frisbie, president of the U.S.-China Business Council, said during a panel discussion.

President Barack Obama pushed China's exchange rate practices to the top of the bilateral agenda this month when he complained countries that undervalue their currency put U.S. companies at a huge competitive disadvantage.

That added to a growing list of issues straining U.S.-Sino ties, including Obama's plan to meet with Tibet's exiled spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, on Thursday.

Many Western economists maintain that China's currency is undervalued by 25 to 40 percent, giving Chinese companies an unfair advantage in international trade.

Charles Freeman, a former U.S. trade official now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said he agreed Beijing would allow the yuan to rise gradually this year "as long as (its) exports don't drop through the floor."

Many within China who "are deeply upset that they continue to have to spend hundreds of billions of dollar every year" to suppress the value of the currency, Freeman said.

"So you know, there are pressures internally in China to appreciate the renminbi for its own purposes and I'll we'll see an appreciation this year," said Freeman, who worked on China issues at the U.S. Trade Representative's office.

Beijing allowed its currency to rise about 20 percent between July 2005 and July 2008, but put on the brakes to help stabilize its exports when the global financial crisis hit.

Obama's recent comments have raised speculation his administration might label China a "currency manipulator" in an semiannual Treasury Department report due on April 15.

"My gut is it doesn't out-and-out name China a currency manipulator, but it comes awful close," Freeman said.

"I think the administration's approach is going to be to shake a big stick on appreciation and, when they move, declare victory," he said.

But for all the political attention China's exchange rate gets in Washington, it's "never a Top Ten issue" for U.S.-China Business Council members, Frisbie said.

A far bigger concern is China's practice of rebating value-added taxes on exports, he said.

Wednesday's panel discussion focused mostly on a Chinese proposal to promote its high-technology sector by excluding foreign companies from its vast government procurement market unless they establish Chinese brands and transfer research and development of new products to China.

Freeman, a former assistant U.S. trade representative in charge of China, said the United States has lost considerable leverage over the Asian manufacturing giant in recent years.

U.S. negotiators used to be able to threaten Congress would close the U.S. market to Chinese goods, but the Chinese "don't believe the threats any more," Freeman said.

That, plus the view of many in China that they have already surpassed the United States in economic might, makes it difficult for U.S. negotiators to change the country's behavior on any policy that is not a clear violation of World Trade Organization rules, he said.

(Editing by Neil Stempleman.)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Pete_Murphy wrote:
A stronger yuan will do absolutely nothing toward reducing the U.S. trade deficit with China. China will simply find ways to compensate in order to maintain and even expand their share of the U.S. market, just as the Japanese did when, since the 1970s, the Japanese yen appreciated by over 300%. Instead of declining, Japan’s trade surplus with the U.S. actually exploded during that time frame.

Global trade imbalances are not driven by currency valuations; they’re driven by disparities in population density that create huge excesses of labor in badly overpopulated countries. Nations in such a state will never let something so trivial as currency valuations erode the exports upon which they depend so heavily.

Feb 17, 2010 2:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Gorm wrote:
China operates more like a business than a nation!! Seemingly I see more focused business sense employed with China where I see more emotion and special interest employed in US endeavors.

Got to give them credit. China usually makes wise decisions that serve THEIR interests, ie buying commodities, cementing contracts when prices are depressed, managing their currency to THEIR advantage, etc.

Sure wish we could learn to run our country like a business!! The way we are WASTING money how long can we last???

Feb 17, 2010 5:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.