U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Obama names deficit panel, gives it broad leeway

Related Topics

1 of 4. President Barack Obama signs an executive order creating a National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform in the Diplomatic Reception Room at the White House in Washington, February 18, 2010. Alongside Obama is (L-R) Vice President Joe Biden, commission vice chair Erskine Bowles and commission Vice President Alan Simpson.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

WASHINGTON | Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:38pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama named a bipartisan panel on Thursday to tackle exploding U.S. budget deficits and promised it broad leeway to recommend ways to put the country on a path to fiscal responsibility.

"Everything's on the table. That's how this thing's going to work," Obama told reporters after tapping former White House chief of staff Erskine Bowles, a Democrat, and former Senator Alan Simpson, a Republican, to lead the 18-member commission.

Obama's comments suggested the panel would have the latitude to consider any proposals to cut government spending -- which he warned had become extravagant -- and raise taxes.

But any recommendations would have to be approved by the bitterly divided Congress, which could be reluctant to take the unpopular steps necessary to stem the tide of red ink amid heavy lobbying by outside interest groups in the months before a congressional election.

Obama promised during his campaign that families making less than $250,000 would not face tax increases but recently said he was "agnostic" about whether the panel could consider middle-class tax hikes.

Facing political pressure and investor anxiety over mounting government debt, Obama asked the commission to come up with a strategy to balance the budget, excluding interest payments, in five years.

"I'm asking them to produce clear recommendations on how to cover the cost of all federal programs by 2015 and to meaningfully improve our long-term fiscal picture," he said. "I have every confidence that they'll do that."

To achieve the goal, Obama paired Simpson, a tall, rangy former legislator from Wyoming, with the bespectacled Bowles, who has a patrician bearing as a North Carolina banker.

The administration estimates the panel's recommendations could bring annual budget deficits down to 3 percent of gross domestic product. The White House forecast a $1.6 trillion budget deficit this year, or about 10.6 percent of GDP.

Economists say 3 percent annual deficits could keep the debt from soaring further, but some fiscal hawks lament that Obama is not setting a more aggressive goal.

The panel's recommendations must be reported to Congress by December 1.

SYMBOLIC GESTURE?

Analysts said the commission would be only a symbolic gesture unless legislators muster the will to take action. Obama used an executive order to form the panel because the Senate was unable to even pass a plan to create its own.

"Both sides need to probably slaughter some sacred cows, and right now I don't think that there's political will on either side -- the well is so poisoned," said Chris Krueger, an analyst with Concept Capital, which tracks Washington for institutional investors.

The commission has been called a way to provide political cover for Obama and Congress in case they implement unpopular measures such as raising taxes to close the budget gap.

Republicans, who have remained remarkably unified against Democratic proposals on a host of issues, made clear they back spending cuts to trim the deficit and oppose tax hikes.

"Americans know our problem is not that we tax too little but that Washington spends too much -- that should be the focus of this commission," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said in a statement.

McConnell will participate by naming members to the commission, a spokeswoman said.

With Republicans hoping for big gains in November congressional elections that could hand them control of the House of Representatives or Senate, they have little incentive to support the Democratic president's efforts.

Obama's fellow Democrats praised the choice of Bowles and Simpson, although some worry about shifting focus too soon on deficit reduction while the economy remains fragile.

"Their selection as co-chairs indicates that the Obama administration is serious about making this process work," said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, whose similar proposal failed in the Senate last month.

Obama said encouraging businesses to create jobs would remain his top priority, but said he had to act on the deficit. "There's no doubt that we're going to have to also address the long-term quandary of a government that routinely and extravagantly spends more than it takes in," he said.

The panel will have 18 members, 12 to be appointed by Democratic and Republican leaders in Congress, and six by Obama. No more than four of Obama's choices will be from the same political party. Fourteen of 18 votes on the panel will be needed to report recommendations.

(Additional reporting by Steve Holland and Thomas Ferraro; editing by Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (24)
THeRmoNukE wrote:
How about no more free money for the children of tax-evading criminal drug dealers with 10 kids through 7 women?

I’m a nice guy, I’m all for helping people out, but I don’t know if the government should be spending my taxes on subsidizing the drug trade anymore by paying helpless and addicted women to be slaves to their dealers, while promoting that environment and lifestyle for the children. That child is the parent’s responsibility, the extended family’s responsibility, along with all the suffering they endure, and I do not want part of my earnings giving that lifestyle a big stamp of approval of the USA.

We can all agree that welfare is a ripe chunk of money that anyone can defraud. We need to figure out how we can combat this fraud for the very legitimate cases where people need help from something outside of their control. Drug testing applicants is not sufficient, nor is it that simple. People tell me, “It’s dumb to get married.” They are right, they will end up with free diapers and formula by being a “single parent” unofficially living with their spouse on two incomes.

I need to see you homeless before any money flows. You are going to have to move and live somewhere outside of your environment, maybe hundreds of miles away. You will have to work. Community service; you must leave your home with your child/children and be productive daily. I’m sure the experts can figure something out. Welfare needs to be a program, not a check. Many of these recipients have hit rock bottom, and giving money is like the classic alcoholic’s enabler; well intentioned, but adding to the problem. If we can not enforce lawful implementation then the trend will continue.

Feb 18, 2010 11:36am EST  --  Report as abuse
This will hopefully turn out to be a good thing. Congress should be working together to address our country’s financial problems. It shows good leadership on Obama’s part to push to get this going.

Feb 18, 2010 11:39am EST  --  Report as abuse
Streetfighter wrote:
It’s sad that the President had to go all the way back to Senator Simpsom to find a Rational Republican.

Feb 18, 2010 11:40am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.