Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.

Fed's Duke: Rate hike not monetary policy signal

WASHINGTON | Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:33pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve's decision on Thursday to raise the interest rate it charges on emergency loans was not meant to signal a period of tighter interest rates was at hand, Federal Reserve Governor Elizabeth Duke said.

The hike in the discount rate to 0.75 percent from 0.5 percent, effective Friday, and the earlier ending of some extraordinary credit programs represent "further normalization of the Federal Reserve's lending facilities" and nothing more, said Duke.

"They do not signal any change in the outlook for monetary policy and are not expected to lead to tighter financial conditions for households and businesses," she said in an address at the Economics Club of Hampton Roads, in Norfolk, Virginia, echoing a statement by the Fed in announcing the rate hike.

Duke outlined the wide variety of emergency lending and other measures that the Fed put in place -- some within days of her being sworn in on August 4, 2008 -- at the height of the financial crisis and stressed how vital they have been.

"I wholeheartedly believe that without the actions taken by the Federal Reserve, our financial system would have frozen and the outcome for the economy would have been unthinkable," she said.

Duke made clear that some actions that Fed governors had to approve at the peak of the crisis were easier than others, especially the decision to make huge loans to distressed insurer American International Group.

"I wasn't there for Bear Stearns, but I did have to vote on the AIG loan," Duke said. "And I can tell you it was the hardest decision I have ever made."

At the time, she said, panic was so rife in financial markets that it was consuming companies like the monster in an old movie called "The Blob."

"We had just watched it eat Lehman. Now it was focused on AIG," she said. "The clock was ticking, and default was imminent."

The Fed felt it had little choice except to lend to AIG because letting it fail would have "huge" consequences for markets, given its far-flung connections, she said.

"If I had to cast that vote again, even knowing all that followed, including the criticism that we have received, I wouldn't change it," Duke said.

She said the Fed still expects to incur no losses on the loans to AIG.

(Reporting by Glenn Somerville, Editing by Leslie Adler)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.