China says Google hacking claims "groundless"

Related Topics

A bird flies over Google China headquarters building next to a Chinese national flag in Beijing January 14, 2010.REUTERS/Jason Lee

A bird flies over Google China headquarters building next to a Chinese national flag in Beijing January 14, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Lee

BEIJING | Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:18pm EST

BEIJING (Reuters) - Google's assertion that its computers were attacked by hackers based in China was "groundless," Beijing said on Tuesday, hardening its rhetoric in a spat with Washington over Internet freedom.

The remarks from Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang were the first direct rejection of the firm's allegations. China had previously defended its right to censor content on the Internet and brushed aside the hacking accusations, saying Google must abide by Chinese law.

"Google's statement from January 12 is groundless, and we are firmly opposed to it," Qin told a regular news briefing in the Chinese capital, when asked if there had been any development in a dispute that is now more than a month old.

"China administers its Internet according to law, and this position will not change. China prohibits hacking and will crack down on hacking according to law," he added.

Google, the world's top search engine, said in January it had uncovered sophisticated China-based attacks on human rights activists using its Gmail service around the world.

Google said other firms had also been affected, and after checks into the attacks, the firm had decided it was no longer willing to tolerate censorship on its Google.cn search engine. Google also threatened to shut its China offices.

Washington backed Google and urged Beijing to investigate the hacking complaints thoroughly and transparently.

In Washington, State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley had no direct response to China's latest assertion, but said the U.S. position on the matter remained unchanged.

"It is our perspective that individuals in China played a role in that (incident). That continues to be our perspective and we will continue to have these conversations with China on this subject," Crowley told a news briefing.

The dispute about Internet censorship has added to tensions about issues ranging from trade and the Chinese currency, to a meeting last week between U.S. President Barack Obama and exiled Tibetan leader the Dalai Lama.

The hacking issue made headlines anew after recent reports in the Western media that the attacks had been traced to two schools in China, and the writer of the spyware used had been identified as a Chinese security consultant in his 30s with government links.

The prestigious Shanghai Jiaotong University and previously unknown Lanxiang vocational college, a high-school level institution, have both denied any role in the attacks.

GOOGLE-CHINA TALKS

The foreign ministry's Qin said the schools' comments showed the reports were false, as were claims of a link with Beijing.

"Reports that these attacks came from Chinese schools are totally groundless and the accusation of Chinese government involvement is also irresponsible and driven by ulterior motives," Qin said.

The official Xinhua news agency lashed out as well, with a commentary saying the stories were "arbitrary and full of bias."

Chinese people know little about online security, and so their computers can easily be taken over by hackers to give the impression that the hackers are based in China, it said.

Google's Chinese-language search engine is still censoring results, but talks between the firm and the Chinese government, on whether the firm might be able to run an unrestricted search service within Chinese law, have restarted, the Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday.

They had taken a break over Chinese New Year, the biggest holiday of the year when most of the country grinds to a halt.

Qin declined to comment directly on any negotiations, saying he had no details but "relevant officials are having smooth communication with relevant Internet companies."

(Reporting by Emma Graham-Harrison, additional reporting by Ben Blanchard, editing by Bill Tarrant and Philip Barbara)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Benny_Acosta wrote:
That the attacks came from computers at those schools could simply mean that the computers used were zombies. Likely part of a botnet.

If the guy who wrote the programs has been identified and linked to the government then there’s really nothing the Chinese government can say to deny it. They should own up and handle the situation responsibly. Considering that the emails of dissidents were targeted there’s really no other way to interpret the attacks as anything but state sponsored.

Feb 23, 2010 10:03am EST  --  Report as abuse
nidan48 wrote:
Another denial by the Chinese. What a surprise. It’s their primary tactic. Next will be a groundless counter-accusation. It’s all about keeping face.

Feb 23, 2010 6:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
urgod wrote:
quote:
===========
That the attacks came from computers at those schools could simply mean that the computers used were zombies. Likely part of a botnet.

If the guy who wrote the programs has been identified and linked to the government then there’s really nothing the Chinese government can say to deny it. They should own up and handle the situation responsibly. Considering that the emails of dissidents were targeted there’s really no other way to interpret the attacks as anything but state sponsored.
============
well, the very day after google’s threaten to quit china, google’s major rival in china, baidu was hacked for a day, and baidu.com was re-direct to a Iran page, Dose it mean the iran govt should be responsible for this?

BTW, the two schools that mentioned before, one of them is only teaching hairdressing or cooking.

Feb 23, 2010 8:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.