Editor's Choice

Medical journal bars tobacco-backed research papers

Related Topics

HONG KONG | Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:24am EST

HONG KONG (Reuters) - A leading scientific journal will no longer publish research papers that receive any funding from tobacco companies, its editorial board said on Tuesday.

"While we continue to be interested in analyses of ways of reducing tobacco use, we will no longer be considering papers where support, in whole or in part, for the study or the researchers come from a tobacco company," the PLoS Medicine (Public Library of Science) said in an editorial.

The magazine expressed concern at "the industry's longstanding attempts to distort the science of and deflect attention away from the harmful effects of smoking.

"That the tobacco industry has behaved disreputably - denying the harms of its products, campaigning against smoking bans, marketing to young people and hiring public relations firms, consultants and front groups to enhance the public credibility of their work -- is well documented."

Its new policy would be effective immediately.

PLoS Medicine is a well regarded journal covering the full spectrum of the medical sciences and belongs to the U.S.-based, non-profit organization Public Library of Science.

According to the Tobacco Atlas produced by the World Lung Foundation and American Cancer Society, there will be an estimated 6 million tobacco-related deaths in 2010 worldwide, rising to 7 million in 2020.

The paper is available here%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1000237.

(Reporting by Tan Ee Lyn; Editing by Ron Popeski)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
logic wrote:
It’s a good start anyway.

So when the corporations start whining about their rights as an individual, can we jail them and put them on trial the same as common drug dealers?

Feb 23, 2010 10:13am EST  --  Report as abuse
dee823 wrote:
And what about the funding that universities and research facilities receive from the drug manufacturers? No research funded by profit-based entities is free from bias.

Feb 23, 2010 11:17am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.