UPDATE 1-US House slaps antitrust law on health insurers

Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:26pm EST

* House votes to put health insurers under antitrust law

* Bill no longer includes medical malpractice insurers

By Diane Bartz

WASHINGTON, Feb 24 (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives voted on Wednesday to take a 65-year-old antitrust exemption away from health insurance companies, leaning hard on an industry that has been the focus of criticism for fast-rising rates.

The chamber voted 406 to 19 to effectively repeal an antitrust exemption that has meant that states take the lead in enforcing antitrust law for health insurers. Consumer groups say states often lack the resources to effectively regulate insurers.

"Just recently 80,000 Iowans were told that their insurance rates would go up 18 percent," said Rep. Leonard Boswell in debate before the vote. "Iowans in the 3rd district are struggling to make ends meet."

The debate took place on the margins of a larger healthcare debate. On Thursday, President Barack Obama will host a healthcare summit, the latest step in his uphill battle to break an impasse in Congress over a sweeping overhaul of the $2.5 trillion industry, one of his domestic policy priorities.

Supporters portrayed the bill as a way to tamp down sharply rising health insurance costs, such as those from WellPoint Inc (WLP.N), which raised rates an average of 25 percent for some Anthem Blue Cross customers in California.

WellPoint Chief Executive Angela Braly, at a hearing on the issue on Wednesday, said the company was concerned that it would lose the ability to share data with other companies. "It's not going to affect healthcare costs one way or another," she said.

The Senate Judiciary Committee's version of the legislation is narrower in some ways than the House version, although the Senate bill also strips medical malpractice insurers of their antitrust exemption. Obama has said that he would sign the repeal into law. (Additional reporting by Susan Heavey, editing by Matthew Lewis)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
releggneh wrote:
This crazy socialist just wants to sign something into law & he don’t care what it costs us!!! Give him a coloring book or something & keep him out of our lives!! Maybe Chavez needs some help running his great country, we don’t need obama’s kind of help on anything!! If he would just quit meddling in every aspect, it would straighten itself out!!! But he truly thinks he is the great mesiah!!NOT

Feb 24, 2010 10:51pm EST  --  Report as abuse
littlepaws wrote:
Obama is no more a Socialist than Ronald Reagan was. Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican, instituted the antitrust laws to control big business and they served America well until Republicans changed that. You do not know the meaning of the word Socialist. Why not do a little research and expand your mind?

Feb 24, 2010 11:24pm EST  --  Report as abuse
burf wrote:
Always amazes me, how so many seem to have an inability to think for themselves.
Releggneh: Please stop listening to talk radio, or watching Fox News, and educate yourself. You’re being manipulated.

Feb 24, 2010 11:50pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.