Intel says hackers attacked around time Google hit

SAN FRANCISCO Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:55pm EST

A sign is shown at the entrance to the headquarters of Intel Corporation in Santa Clara, California February 2, 2010. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith

A sign is shown at the entrance to the headquarters of Intel Corporation in Santa Clara, California February 2, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith

Related Topics

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Intel Corp said it faced a "sophisticated" hacker attack in January about the same time as the recently publicized Chinese hacker attacks on Google Inc, but noted no clear link between the two events.

Google would not comment on whether Intel was one of the roughly 20 unnamed companies that the world's No. 1 Internet search engine said had been similarly targeted in attacks that originated in China.

The attack was just one of what the world's largest chipmakers said were regular attempts on its computer systems, Intel said in a filing under a heading about potential theft or misuse of the company's intellectual property.

"The only connection is timing," Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy said, declining to elaborate. The company first publicized the attack and pointed out the similarity in timing to the move on Google in an annual filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Now that Google has publicly admitted to being successfully attacked without much damage to their reputation, analysts said other companies are rethinking their typically tight-lipped approach to security breaches.

Recent changes to disclosure laws and increased awareness of cyber-security may also have prompted Intel to come clean, analysts say.

But Intel did not say who was behind the attacks, from where in the world they originated, or what information, if any, had been taken.

Asked whether Intel had spoken or worked with Google on this issue, Mulloy said: "Our security folks work very closely and collaboratively throughout the industry."

"Companies are facing these threats and attacks all the time," Fred Pinkett, vice president of product management for Core Security Technologies, said.

In targeting companies like Intel, which have one of the largest intellectual property portfolios in the world, hackers may have been looking for bragging rights.

"Very rarely are they really trying to commit industrial espionage, because it's really hard to do that without getting caught," said Todd Feinman, chief executive of Identity Finder.

The reason Intel probably publicized the hack attempts was to minimize the company's legal risks, he added. "The advantage is that you're protecting yourself for when it finally does happen and something really bad occurs, because you can say 'we disclosed this information on our 10-K.'"

Intel shares closed down 48 cents, or 2.31 percent, at $20.38 on Nasdaq. They edged up to $20.40 after hours.

(Reporting by Ian Sherr; Additional reporting by Alexei Oreskovic; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn, Gerald E. McCormick and Richard Chang)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
urgod wrote:
at the same time, chinese Baidu being hacked also, which just one day after the google’s anouncement of quiting china.

so…

Feb 23, 2010 8:52pm EST  --  Report as abuse
sephamorr wrote:
so we disconnect china from the internet.

Feb 23, 2010 9:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
dli wrote:
What a joke! Every one of us get virus and Trojans in our E-mail in boxes. You don’t see me got crying about people trying to hack into my computer! Stop opening those dumb ass E-mail attachments.. and they call it “sophisticated” . For god’s sake you are F…ing Google. Train your employee better.. If some one had to open an attachment, i wouldn’t call it a HACK!!

Feb 24, 2010 6:26am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.