The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.

Bernanke to outline exit path to skeptical Congress

Related News

Related Topics

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke speaks during a presentation at the American Economic Association conference in Atlanta, January 3, 2010. REUTERS/Tami Chappell

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke speaks during a presentation at the American Economic Association conference in Atlanta, January 3, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Tami Chappell

NEW YORK | Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:04am EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Ben Bernanke may have cleared the hurdles to his confirmation for a second term as Federal Reserve chairman, but that does not mean lawmakers will be any friendlier to him at high-profile hearings on Wednesday and Thursday.

The Fed chief's semiannual report to Congress should feature both impassioned debate over financial regulation and lots of questions about the central bank's evolving strategy to remove unprecedented monetary stimulus from the financial system.

With the economy just emerging from the worst recession since the Great Depression, the Fed and its chairman have come under fire for not doing enough to prevent the financial meltdown. Bernanke was confirmed late last month by a 70-30 margin, the tightest-ever Senate vote for a Fed chairman.

"Perhaps the most interesting part of the testimony will be the way the oversight committees treat the chairman, after the hostility they've recently displayed toward the Federal Reserve and Bernanke himself, especially through the confirmation struggle," said Larry Meyer, a former Fed Board governor now with Macroeconomic Advisers.

In a sense, Bernanke has already previewed Wednesday's testimony. Earlier this month, the Fed released his prepared remarks to be delivered before the very same U.S. House Financial Services Committee, though the hearing never took place because of a severe snow storm.

Given the level of detail provided in that speech, and internal disagreement within the Fed on key details about the best sequencing of exit steps, Bernanke would be hard-pressed to unveil too much more on that front.

"I don't expect anything terribly new given the fact that he just got confirmed recently and just did this testimony," said Larry Kantor, head of research at Barclays Capital.

Instead, Bernanke will try to reinforce the notion that last week's increase in the discount rate charged to banks for emergency loans was a technical move, not a policy shift.

He will also use the opportunity to defend the central bank's role in financial supervision, which has come under attack from some reform proposals floated in the Senate.

With the details of new regulatory approach still very much in play, Bernanke may be asked for his views on the "Volcker" rule, a much-debated measure launched by White House adviser Paul Volcker that would reinstate a separation between the speculative activities of big financial firms and their brick-and-mortar lending.

He could also be asked about the wisdom of setting up a consumer financial protection agency, an idea he has broadly supported in the past.

ONE EXIT, MANY TOOLS

Bernanke is sure to use the forum, formerly known as the Humphrey-Hawkins testimony, to reiterate the range of tools available to the Fed to remove the extraordinary monetary support employed to deal with the crisis.

The Fed not only slashed interest rates close to zero, but also created a range of short-term lending facilities to boost market liquidity. It also purchased over $1.7 trillion in Treasury bonds and mortgage-linked debt.

Bernanke and others on the Fed's Washington-based board have shown a preference for using the interest paid on bank reserves and reserve-draining operations as the primary tool for tightening policy. Manipulating the federal funds rate has become more difficult because of the increased volume of reserves.

Bank reserves held at the Fed on any given week have mushroomed from around $6 billion or so before the crisis to about $1.2 trillion currently.

Minutes from the Fed's January meeting, released last week, showed a number of officials favor selling some of the assets during the crisis.

The minutes did flag two key events to watch for in coming months, but suggested they would only come by spring. These include using mortgage debt as collateral for reverse repurchase agreements, and securing a broader range of counterparties for such operations, which allow the Fed to remove funds from the banking system.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
muchstardude wrote:
Can you imagine how much worse the housing market would be in if we had a discount rate two or three percentage points higher? Ben’s zero cost of funds is what this economy needs. The fed is NOT the problem. Let’s slap some hard term limits on the jokers that think it is. I work for http://storyburn.com and the mess that lands on our doorstep is crazy bad: temp job being the new full time job, China stealing our mojo, Wall Street bonuses at record highs, and people taking a 10% paycut and asked to work unpaid overtime.

Feb 23, 2010 8:35pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Jonalist wrote:
Reformation should not be in the hands of the Fed. Congress needs a report of the Fed to analyze the problems and present the Fed with a instant recourse of direction to improve the economy based on policies they would mandate and this don’t relax the Feds but improves the Fed overall performance in areas where there are no current problems or applications of new policy needed. Feds seeking to spend more money in solving a problem may have a backward approach to resolution without a mandate which gives them some move power for home contracts where jobs are situated instead of locations that jobs are to far away to have any affect for consumers.

Feb 23, 2010 8:59pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Bob9999 wrote:
With all of its shortcomings, the Fed has a lot of integrity. Look at Congress, where neither party has ever seen a special interest it wouldn’t prostitute itself to. The guys who can’t pay — i.e., the voters — get stuck with the bill. The bill comes in the form of taxes on ordinary workers and debt that is incurred to make up for the taxes that are not paid by the special interests.

Feb 23, 2010 9:56pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.