Wal-Mart to cut emissions from supply chain

The Wal-Mart logo is seen on a sign in Phoenix, Arizona, February 18, 2010. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, the world's biggest retailer, releases its fourth quarter earnings report on on Thursday. REUTERS/Joshua Lott

The Wal-Mart logo is seen on a sign in Phoenix, Arizona, February 18, 2010. Wal-Mart Stores Inc, the world's biggest retailer, releases its fourth quarter earnings report on on Thursday.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Lott

SAN FRANCISCO | Thu Feb 25, 2010 3:57pm EST

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Wal-Mart Stores Inc plans to massively cut greenhouse gas emissions from its global supply chain within five years -- an effort the retailer said is equivalent to taking more than 3.8 million cars off the road for a year.

Wal-Mart will reach that goal by having its suppliers reduce emissions involved in the sourcing, manufacturing, transportation, and disposal of the thousands of products it sells in its stores.

The plan to eliminate 20 million metric tons of greenhouse gas from its supply chain by the end of 2015 was announced in a Webcast on Thursday.

Chief Executive Mike Duke said the effort would cut energy use, which in turn would mean lower costs for Wal-Mart and lower prices.

"We do plan and want to continue to build stores. We want to add square footage. That's the reality of our business," Duke said. "Yet we know we need to get ready for a world in which energy will only be more expensive, and that there will only be a greater need to operate with less carbon in the supply chain."

The move is part of broader goals Wal-Mart has outlined to one day use only renewable energy and create zero waste. It has increased its use of solar power and announced plans to roll out an index that will measure the environmental impact of the products it sells in its stores.

The United States is the world's second-leading emitter, after China, of greenhouse gases that scientists blame for warming the planet. U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels like coal and oil should rise this year and next as the economy recovers, according to the Energy Information Administration.

But corporate announcements of plans to cut those emissions have become more rare as a climate bill in the Senate faces tough opposition from lawmakers in energy dependent states, and as rich and poor countries struggle to share the burden of taking action on global warming.

Experts have said that some companies are afraid to promise reductions because they fear they will not be rewarded for their early action in government-run carbon markets.

Duke said America needs "comprehensive legislative policy that addresses energy, energy security, the country's competitiveness and reducing pollution."

But he said companies can take steps now to cut energy use. He said the greenhouse gas emissions it aims to eliminate represent one and a half times Wal-Mart's estimated global carbon footprint growth over the next five years.

Wal-Mart, which collaborated with the Environmental Defense Fund on the effort, said it would work with suppliers to focus first on products where it has the biggest opportunity to take carbon out of the system.

For instance, Matt Kistler, its senior vice president of sustainability, said suppliers could make clothes that can be washed in cold water instead of hot water, or accelerate the innovation of fabrics that dry faster.

Wal-Mart is already enforcing stricter quality and environmental standards for its Chinese suppliers, looking at factories' air emissions, management of toxic substances and disposal of hazardous waste.

Some of Wal-Mart's actions have been criticized by groups that contend the company is squeezing suppliers who cannot pass on higher prices to offset the investments needed to meet Wal-Mart's standards.

Wal-Mart said it wanted to pursue projects that are "economically viable" and would reduce costs, not raise them.

(Additional reporting by Timothy Gardner in Washington; editing by Gunna Dickson))

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
dabaum wrote:
Thank you for your great writing of the “Wal-Mart to cut emissions from supply chain” story.

We have a new solution for multiple high-tech cleaners that would be an 80% CO2 savings for Wal-mart if they replaced their liquid cleaners (glass, multi-surface, etc.) with ours. For every one full truck-load of our cleaners, it would take 8 trucks of, say Windex, off the road.

That means 1/8th less fuel, road-wear, loading and unloading time, tires, brakes, truck wear, people-hours, etc….

www.conservebrand.com

The problem is a dynamic tension between Mass Markets customers demanding they Go Green and their own profits.

This is where the ass-to-the-fire story really is.

Why would they want to be proactive in going green when they make money by

1. selling existing product and
2. having their customers come in more often AND
3. leaving well enough alone the existing behemoth non-green-brands that are known by customers to produce results for customers and profits for the retailer.

Anything NEW is a threat…even when it would produce unprecedented Green results.

Let me know if you want an expanded view of a manufacturer working for about a year now to overcome the obstacles Wal-marts of the USA are facing.

David

Feb 26, 2010 4:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.