The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Industry crackdown on salt could save U.S. billions

Related Topics

CHICAGO | Mon Mar 1, 2010 5:41pm EST

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Working with the food industry to cut salt intake by nearly 10 percent could prevent hundreds of thousands of heart attacks and strokes over several decades and save the U.S. government $32 billion in healthcare costs, U.S. researchers said on Monday.

Eating too much salt is a major cause of high blood pressure, which the Institute of Medicine, one of the National Academies of Sciences, last week declared a "neglected disease" that costs the U.S. health system $73 billion a year.

Several governments including the United States are looking for solutions to curb salt intake as a way to head off future heart attacks and strokes that help drain healthcare systems.

The study by a team at the Stanford University School of Medicine and the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System in California used a computer model to measure the impact of two different scenarios for reducing salt intake on a population level -- a voluntary collaboration with the U.S. food industry and a national tax on salt.

They found the voluntary program, based on a similar salt-reduction campaign in Britain, to be the most effective.

The team estimated that a government-industry effort could cut Americans' salt intake by 9.5 percent.

"In our analysis, we found these small decreases in blood pressure would be effective in reducing deaths due to cardiovascular disease," said Dr. Crystal Smith-Spangler of the VA, whose study appears in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

The salt reduction campaign would prevent 513,885 fatal strokes and 480,358 heart attacks over the lifetimes of U.S. adults who are aged 40 to 85 today. That would save $32.1 billion in health costs during the lifetime of this group, including $14 billion in hospitalizations for strokes and heart attacks.

"The numbers of affected people are huge, so even a small decrease is significant if you have large numbers of people involved," Smith-Spangler said in a statement.

By contrast, a tax on salt would cut salt intake by 6 percent, resulting in 327,892 fewer strokes and 306,173 fewer heart attacks, the team calculated.

75 PERCENT EAT TOO MUCH SALT

As many as 75 percent of Americans consume more than the suggested maximum of 2.3 grams of salt a day, Dr. Thomas Frieden, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said in a commentary in the journal.

Because three-fourths of Americans' salt intake comes from processed foods and restaurant meals, he said, it is not feasible to reduce the nation's salt intake without food industry cooperation.

"If cooperation is not voluntary, new regulations on sodium content of processed and prepared foods might be necessary," Frieden wrote.

A program in Britain to cut salt intake in foods has resulted in a 20 to 30 percent decline in salt in processed foods sold in stores since 2003. Japan, Finland, Ireland, Australia and Canada have launched similar initiatives, Frieden said.

The city of New York started a program in January to encourage food makers and restaurant chains to cut their salt use by 25 percent over the next five years.

(Editing by Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (21)
Swarm wrote:
Think of how much healthier we’d be and how much money we’d save if the federal government took over all food preparation and serving. They could cook very healthy food and it would save a LOT of time and money. We could all meet in communal halls for every meal.

Yes, Obamunism is indeed wonderful!

Welcome to life on the Progressive Plantation.

Mar 01, 2010 5:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
GJC1 wrote:
Opposing view
http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/printable_news.lasso?id=9265&table=news

Mar 01, 2010 6:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
thetruthisnow wrote:
Agreed, this is silly. There’s no conclusive evidence linking sodium to high blood pressure and heard disease, yet these Obamacrat liberals have to stick their hands in everything.

Mar 01, 2010 6:16pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.