U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Calcium, vitamin D pills don't help heart: study

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Mon Mar 1, 2010 5:20pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Don't expect your calcium and vitamin D supplements to improve your heart health or prevent a stroke, according to a systematic review of published studies.

While vitamin D and calcium are clearly important for bone health, write the authors of the review, evidence on whether they help heart health is conflicting.

In the U.S., the recommended daily intake of calcium is 1000 milligrams, and 400 international units for vitamin D. Skin produces vitamin D when directly exposed to the sun, but this is usually not enough.

Milk, breakfast cereals and orange juice fortified with the vitamins are the main food sources, though some fatty fish naturally contain high amounts of vitamin D.

Before people who already get enough start taking vitamin D and calcium supplements, senior author Dr. Howard D. Sesso, from Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, and his colleagues wanted to study the evidence to support their use - and make sure there are no hidden risks involved.

"The existing literature is quite sparse" in this area, Sesso told Reuters Health.

None of the 17 studies they uncovered was designed specifically to look at effects of the supplements on heart disease, heart attack, stroke, or death due to related causes.

"Existing trials were designed with other purposes in mind," Sesso explained.

Part of the difficulty in looking at the overall picture was that forms and doses of the supplements differed from one study to another.

Some studies did show that vitamin D supplements cut the risk of dying from heart disease and stroke. However, most of these involved patients with severe kidney disease who were on dialysis, a vast difference from healthy individuals, Sesso noted.

The remaining studies failed to show any meaningful benefits of vitamin D, calcium, or a combination of the two.

So at this time, Sesso says "no" to suggestions that healthy people supplement their diet with calcium or vitamin D.

"Now, if there are specific instances of vitamin D or calcium deficiency, then that's a separate issue that should be discussed with a personal physician," he added.

There are historical lessons about taking supplements, authors of a related editorial warn. For several years, vitamins A and E were believed to prevent multiple ills, ranging from heart disease to cancer. However, major reports that came out in 2005 and 2007 showed that both vitamins actually increased the risk of dying.

"We've learned in the past that things can go really, really wrong" when people start taking vitamin pills, Dr. Eliseo Guallar, lead author of the editorial, told Reuters Health.

Guallar, from Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, and Sesso agree that the best way to avoid a similar outcome is through "good, solid" studies in healthy populations.

SOURCE: Annals of Internal Medicine, March 2, 2010.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
VitaminD3Man wrote:
400 i.u. of vitmain D? That is a nearly meaningless amount and less D than is generated in 40 seconds (seconds) of direct sunlight at midday!

This reflects ignorance at the highest levels within the medical community and the press corp.

400 i.u. of vitamin D? What responsible doctor would even consider such an amount?

reall ythe person(s) responsible for this type of yellow press should be removed from their respective postions.

400 i.u. of vitamin D- per day- is like prescribing one 12 oz. glass of water per day for human activity. Absurd, bad medicine, and in the end murderous. Now uninformed people will give up on vitamin D- our most powerful disease fighter- and go on dying like always.

Mar 01, 2010 6:45pm EST  --  Report as abuse
VitaminD3Man wrote:
What responsible physician, or sceintists, would compare any true vitamin to “vitamin D”?. “Vitamin” D is a steroid hormone and has nothing to do with the former other than to have been misnamed by researchers who understanding of its function was off approximately 180 degrees.

Do not ever compare vitmains to cholecalciferol (D3)- hang nails to hydrogen bombs…

Mar 01, 2010 6:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
danwalter wrote:
I would trust NOTHING coming out of Johns Hopkins cardiology: htp://adventuresincardiology.com/

Mar 02, 2010 9:53am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.