Investors fret over weakened financial reforms

WASHINGTON | Tue Mar 2, 2010 10:55am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Plans to toughen up supervision of the financial system are quickly being weakened in the U.S. Senate, scaring investors and shareholders who fear congressional reforms will end up toothless.

In an effort to win bipartisan support for his bill, Senate Banking Chairman Christopher Dodd is moving to water down plans to create an independent agency to regulate consumer financial products like mortgages and credit cards.

The latest proposal being considered would place the consumer division in the Federal Reserve, even though lawmakers have faulted the Fed for not aggressively cracking down on lax lending and for fueling the housing bubble by keeping interest rates at low levels for a lengthy period.

Investors and consumer advocates are not impressed.

"The financial crisis was caused at least in part by irresponsible mortgage lending and inadequate oversight," said Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller.

"When it comes to mortgages, credit cards and other basic financial matters, consumer protection is buried and often neglected in federal regulatory agencies that have other priorities than protecting ordinary consumers," Miller said.

In November, Dodd introduced legislation designed to avert future financial crises and better protect investors who lost billions when their companies collapsed. But Republicans immediately blasted the draft bill and Dodd started anew with lawmakers from both parties.

Now reforms such as higher standards for broker-dealers, regulation of the $450 trillion over-the-counter derivatives market and rules to make corporate boards more accountable are in danger of being diluted.

The committee may scrap a measure that would have forced brokers to adhere to a higher fiduciary standard if they provide financial advice to clients. Instead, a study of investment adviser regulation may be called for.

Advisers to private equity funds and venture capital funds may escape federal oversight. In addition, there is disagreement among Republicans and Democrats over whether to give shareholders more say on corporate executive pay and greater clout in electing corporate boards.

"We have many concerns about the direction this bill may take, and the stakes are huge for investors, both large and small," said Ann Yerger, executive director of the Council of Institutional Investors, which represents investors holding more than $3 trillion in assets.

"Investors will lose in the end if Congress fails to close regulatory gaps... and neglects to address the governance failures that contributed to this crisis," she said.

One of the Obama administration's keystones in overhauling the country's financial regulation is the Consumer Financial Protection Agency.

The House of Representatives passed a bill in December to create an independent agency that has the authority to write its own rules and enforce them.

But Senate Republicans and some Democrats contend it would be unwise to separate bank regulation from consumer protection.

U.S. businesses, which fear they will no longer be able to create and offer lucrative financial products, have poured all of their resources into killing the independent consumer agency.

"What's at stake is creating the possibility of another financial crisis," said Heather Booth, the director of consumer lobbying group Americans for Financial Reform.

"There is potential for serious problems for consumers and problems for the overall economy."

(Editing by Andrea Ricci)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
lucykay889 wrote:
Who cares!!! My boyfriend thinks the same with me. He- is eight years older than me, lol. We met online at- A_g_e_m_i_n_g_le @ c.o..m a nice and free place for Younger- Women and Older Men, or Older Women and Younger Men, to- interact with each other. Maybe you wanna check out or- tell your friends.

Mar 02, 2010 11:01am EST  --  Report as abuse
BANANA HYMN OF THE REPUBLIC
(America the Beautiful)
WilliamBanzai7
O beautiful and spacious lies,
For fraudulent Wall Street gains,
With pinstriped swindling tragedies
Above your 401k!
America! America!
God won’t shed this disgrace from thee
And crown those hoods–the banksta brotherhood
From scheme to ponzi scheme!

O beautiful for thievery and political lies
Whose two faced distress
A thoroughfare of lobbying and greed
Across the populist wilderness!
America! America!
God send thine every corrupt and crony fiend,
Confirm thy soul without self-control,
Their liberties above the law!

O beautiful for heroes screwed
In bungled economic strife.
Those who love themselves above their land
And moral hazard more than life!
America! America!
May God’s work Goldman’s Blankfein refine
Till all success be Fat Cat nobleness
And bailout gains divine!

O beautiful for patriots reamed
That sees beyond the tears of subprime slime
Thine asset bubble cities gleam
Undimmed by quantitative legerdemain!
America! America!
God won’t shed this disgrace from thee
And crown those hoods– the banksta brotherhood
One big den of Wall Street thieves!

Mar 02, 2010 11:28am EST  --  Report as abuse
MHCO wrote:
In the face of the outrage of the financial meltdown, the Republican’s appear to be cynically aware of realities of their voting constituencies. They are too stupid to care that the republican’s caused this mess, and built the China’s ascendancy on the back of American innovation. They also apparently do not care about future of the US , because they are convinced Jesus is coming for them. Building districts of hard core conservatives through gerrymandering ( legalized by the supreme court) is precisely why change has been thwarted. You do not need a majority, and you do not need to worry about what the majority of America thinks. I am also very suspicious of Dodd, who may have taken up the cause to make sure it gets scuppered with some believable theatrics about the ‘good fight’. He has been the champion of the people he is supposed to be policing, why stop now? I do not believe he is retiring because he wants to be unencumbered, I believe he is retiring because he is mortal and there are only so many years left he has to spend is ill gotten booty from industry payoffs. His heir apparent may be no better. The formula in state politics seems to be elect an AG who makes a lot of noise, but who ultimately tow the line once in power. In short, we have no champions. There is no percentage in morality. Every time we elect for change, they delay linger and wait. Ultimately it is not going to change, only get worse, although you will probably hear less about it as the investigative media is disassembled and re-aggregated under new agenda friendly ( Odd that the Zealot Murdoch assumes control of the WSJ, right when Wall street ( namely Goldman) has staged and won a bloodless coup in Washington in the form of the stimulous. Management blaming mysterious market forces that seemed to have coalesced to do the most damage when the nation never needed independent voices With Goldman having 131 days of $100 million plus revenue on Wall Street, and the supreme court giving corporations unfettered access to political coffers, my moral indignation has never seemed more impotent.

Mar 02, 2010 11:55am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.