Telco software groups line up facing Google, Apple

Related Topics

HELSINKI | Tue Mar 2, 2010 12:07am EST

HELSINKI (Reuters) - Two telecom operator-backed mobile software groups signaled closer co-operation on Tuesday as carriers face increasing competition from the new rivals Google and Apple.

The two consortiums, wireless Linux group LiMo and application alliance WAC, offer operators alternatives to the software and services of Apple, Google or Nokia as they can brand and customize their software.

"These initiatives are providing independent and neutral means for operators to deliver their own applications and services to counter the rising tide of competition from web players and handset manufacturers," analyst Geoff Blaber from CCS Insight said.

Operator-backed mobile platform group LiMo said it has approached key players behind the new operator application store alliance WAC -- offering help to kickstart operations and to co-operate closely in the future.

"The first response was very warm," LiMo's head Morgan Gillis told Reuters in an interview.

"The industry is trying to carve out an independent approach. It is behaving in a co-operative, co-ordinated way trying to deal with the new competition," Gillis said.

Last month, 24 major telecom operators formed the WAC alliance to build an open platform that will deliver applications to all mobile phone users.

Analysts were skeptical whether so many operators could work together efficiently, but LiMo addition could help, CCS' Blaber said.

"LiMo knows the challenges inherent in building standards by committee. Getting more than 20 operators with competing interests to agree on a standard will not be a straightforward task," Blaber said.

AT&T, Bharti Airtel, China Mobile, MTN Group, NTT DoCoMo, Orange, Orascom Telecom, Telefonica and Vodafone are among the founding members of the WAC alliance.

The alliance is supported also by three of the world's largest phone makers -- LG Electronics, Samsung and Sony Ericsson.

LiMo is an alternative to leading operating systems from Nokia, Apple, Google or Microsoft. Mobile operators are betting on LiMo, where they have more control over software development.

The Linux operating system has so far had limited success on cellphones, but its presence is increasing with Google using Linux for its Android platform on, and LiMo manufacturers rolling out new models.

Linux is the most popular type of free, or so-called open source, computer operating system which is available to the public to be used, revised and shared.

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
csmarker wrote:
I’m sticking with Apple. Hopefully with Verizon soon.

Mar 02, 2010 1:10am EST  --  Report as abuse
zoomaster wrote:
Consumers have way less money to spend than two years ago, so they are much more focused and cell phones are one area they still like. The iPhone is threatening the landline phone, the cable bill and even the landline Internet. Budgets are tight and if you have to spend $80 per month just to turn an iPhone on, you’re not going to spend much else on communications. I work for http://storyburn.com and the mess that lands on our doorstep is crazy bad. We have the most read foreclosure story on the web as well as several job hunting stories.

Mar 02, 2010 7:18am EST  --  Report as abuse
compsci wrote:
“The iPhone is threatening the landline phone, the cable bill and even the landline Internet.”
Let me guess, you’ve been watching Apple adverts and reading their propaganda.

I get 10Mbps on my cable broadband and (in practise) 150kbps on my “3G” mobile. I hope you’ve got a 3G “iPhone” because the non-3G version will be even slower. By the time we have 5Mbps mobile phones, we’ll have 200Mbps broadband that will still be cheaper than the mobile “alternative”.

The differences are partly due to fundamental technical limitations of wireless technology. (Ever heard of “signal to noise ratio” or “bandwidth”, anyone?) The iPhone and iPad hardly have big screens too – so who would seriously work all day on an iPhone? It’s just a new toy that Apple has skilfully presented as “in vogue”, and marketed it to people who like to pose.

p.s. Did you know that mobile telephones existed before the iPhone? 15 years ago in the United Kingdom, people were saying mobile telephones threatened the landline… But it’s still here. The iPhone is no game-changer. I understand the user-interface is innovative but a polished dashboard doesn’t turn a car into an aeroplane.

Mar 02, 2010 7:51am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.