Democrats prepare final healthcare push

Factbox

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi greets House Majority Leader Rep. Steny Hoyer as the House Democrat's Healthcare plan is unveiled on Capitol Hill, October 29, 2009. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi greets House Majority Leader Rep. Steny Hoyer as the House Democrat's Healthcare plan is unveiled on Capitol Hill, October 29, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Roberts

WASHINGTON | Tue Mar 2, 2010 2:36pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. congressional Democrats prepared for a final push to pass healthcare reform without Republican support, even as President Barack Obama said on Tuesday he would explore adding more Republican ideas to his proposal.

House of Representatives Democratic leader Steny Hoyer said he saw the possibility of gaining support for Obama's sweeping healthcare overhaul from Democrats who voted "no" when the House considered it in November.

"We're talking to everybody," Hoyer said. "Do I think there is a possibility of some people changing? Yes I do."

Obama is expected to announce his plans on Wednesday for forging ahead with an overhaul of the $2.5 trillion healthcare system, with Democrats preparing to use a procedure called reconciliation that allows Senate approval by a simple majority vote.

That approach, which can be used only for budget-related measures, would bypass rules that require 60 votes to clear procedural hurdles in the 100-member Senate. Reconciliation needs only a simple Senate majority of 51 votes.

With congressional elections approaching in November, Democrats are anxious to move past the healthcare debate and talk about job creation and the economy.

In a letter to congressional leaders from both parties, Obama said he was considering adding ideas offered by Republicans last week at a day-long healthcare summit but did not agree with their demand for a more incremental approach.

Obama said he was open to Republican ideas for undercover probes of healthcare providers who get federal money, to expanding health savings accounts and to providing more grants to study alternatives to medical malpractice lawsuits.

"I said throughout this process that I'd continue to draw on the best ideas from both parties, and I'm open to these proposals in that spirit," Obama said in the letter.

Democrats in the Senate and House passed healthcare bills last year that would reshape the industry by cutting costs, regulating insurers and expanding coverage to tens of millions of Americans.

But efforts to merge the different measures and send a final version to Obama collapsed in January after Democrats lost their crucial 60th Senate seat in a special election in Massachusetts.

TWO-STEP PROCESS

Using reconciliation to pass the final healthcare bill would be a two-step process. The House would approve the Senate-passed bill and changes to the Senate bill sought by the House would be passed separately through reconciliation.

Many of those changes, such as adjustments to a tax on high-cost insurance plans and additional federal subsidies to make coverage more affordable, were incorporated in a proposal released by Obama last week.

He is expected to adjust that package as part of his announcement on Wednesday and his letter appeared to signal some of the additional Republican proposals he will add.

Democrats still face a challenge in getting the measure through the House, which passed the overhaul with only three votes to spare in November.

Hoyer said he was confident of winning more Democratic converts because "when bills change, members look at it somewhat differently."

Republicans have criticized any effort to use reconciliation on the healthcare bill, even though they have used it to pass bills at least 14 times since 1980.

"Democrats are saying they want a simple up-or-down vote on healthcare. What they really want is to jam their vision of healthcare through Congress over the objections of a public that they seem to think is too ill-informed to notice," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said.

Republicans plan to raise many objections and offer a flood of amendments during the process, hoping to extend the debate and force Democrats into multiple difficult votes ahead of November's election.

(Additional reporting by Thomas Ferraro, Matt Spetalnick and Ross Colvin; Editing by David Alexander and John O'Callaghan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (47)
SkookumJim wrote:
Obama-

What part of “NO” do you not understand?

Mar 01, 2010 11:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Miriamac wrote:
Obama,
I contributed to your campaign largely because you rejected the individual mandate.
Please send my money back now that you’re forcing me to pay $1,000/month to your insurance cronies.

Mar 02, 2010 12:05am EST  --  Report as abuse
jwk68 wrote:
Time to do what he was elected to do– and time to grow the balls to do it. The Repubs sure did– even when they had a president who neither had a popular majority and had to have his presidency given to him by his pals on the Supreme Court. INsurance companies should not be allowed to fatter-n their wallets with preexisting condition exemptions and hypocritical claim denials. I can’t wait to see it happen.

Mar 02, 2010 12:14am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.