New guidelines on prostate cancer urge frank talk

Related Topics

CHICAGO | Wed Mar 3, 2010 1:13pm EST

CHICAGO (Reuters) - New guidelines from the American Cancer Society urge doctors to make sure their patients fully understand the risks as well as the benefits of prostate cancer screening before any blood is drawn.

The updated guidelines issued on Wednesday reflect the ongoing debate over the prostate-specific antigen, or PSA, blood test after two large studies last year produced conflicting results about whether it actually saves lives.

"With these newly updated recommendations, the American Cancer Society places even stronger emphasis on shared decision-making between clinicians and patients," Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, said in a statement.

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide after lung cancer, killing 254,000 men a year.

Doctors have routinely recommended PSA tests to men over 50 in the belief that early diagnosis and aggressive treatment for any cancer is better than standing by and doing nothing.

But a study published last August in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute found routine screening for prostate cancer resulted in more than 1 million U.S. men being diagnosed with tumors who might otherwise have suffered no ill effects from them.

Prostate cancer treatments, including surgery or radiation, can cause incontinence and erectile dysfunction in about a third of patients. Many men also experience bowel problems.

"These risks are not inconsequential. We do want to be sure that men know all of this before they make their decision of whether or not to be screened," said Dr. Andrew Wolf of Virginia Health System, who chaired the advisory committee that developed the guidelines published in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

AVERAGE RISKS

The updated guidelines recommend that men of average risk get information about the risks and benefits of screening by age 50 before making a decision about the test.

Men at higher risk -- including blacks and men with a father or brother who was diagnosed with prostate cancer -- should get this information by age 45.

Men with multiple family members who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer before age 65 should have the prostate cancer discussion with their doctors at age 40.

The group also recommends that doctors use patient decision aids, including one developed by the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making here, which can help men weigh the risks and benefits of screening.

"Hopefully, what we're promoting is that doctors provide as balanced a presentation of the issues as they can," Wolf said in a telephone interview.

And they say no screening should be done without giving men a chance to weigh their options.

"We are increasingly aware of the fact that many men who do choose to be screened are diagnosed with an early prostate cancer that leads to treatment, and if they had not been screened, they never would have known about a cancer that was never destined to harm them," Wolf said.

"That is a very real risk of prostate cancer screening that has become increasingly clear since our last guideline update in 2001," Wolf said.

"The other risks are those of treating prostate cancer that is found through early detection."

(Editing by Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
P3PANAMA wrote:
Having already a PR, PSA was 39 by that time, a value far away from surgery for most Doctors who prefer Radio Therapy (thanks God not for mine) frying you internally, its like shooting gooses with your eyes totally closed. MRI should a protocol on prostate cancer patiences, alter all. PSA can rise becuase of many different reason besdie cancer.

Mar 04, 2010 11:01am EST  --  Report as abuse
P3PANAMA wrote:
Having already a PR, PSA was 39 by that time, a value far away from surgery for most Doctors who prefer Radio Therapy (thanks God not for mine) frying you internally, its like shooting gooses with your eyes totally closed. MRI should a protocol on prostate cancer patiences, alter all. PSA can rise because of many different reason beside cancer.

Mar 04, 2010 11:02am EST  --  Report as abuse
2555smct wrote:
All the discussion about PSA screening is stupid. It is a screening tool to detect irregularities with a man’s PSA levels that are “not normal”. Are they recommending the famous “Head in the sand” technique of medical care? After all, only a positive biopsy result of a cancerous prostate is a reason to begin any course of action/treatment, and if it comes to saving someone from dying from cancer, I would think the medical community would not want to play Russian Roulette with a cancerous prostate in someone who is otherwise healthy. Additionally, from what I’ve researched, the majority of post-operative pathology reposts on the removed prostates of men diagnosed with cancer show far more advanced and often aggressive cancer than was indicated in the needle biopsy before the operation. This was my case in point. I was very glad I was not encouraged to just watch it for a few years and see what happens. Prostate cancer kills its victims by metastasizing outside the prostate and entering other organs and lymph system or bones. It’s not a fun way to die. And the only current almost sure way to prevent dying from prostate cancer (in a healthy man) is to remove the cancer.

Oh, and just so you men understand that prostate cancer is a real threat to you, here are some facts to consider; It is the most common non-skin cancer in America, affecting 1 in 6 men. A non-smoking man is more likely to develop prostate cancer than he is to develop colon, bladder, melanoma, lymphoma and kidney cancers combined. In fact, a man is 35% more likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer than a woman is to be diagnosed with breast cancer.
In 2009, more than 192,000 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer, and more than 27,000 men will die from the disease. One new case occurs every 2.7 minutes and a man dies from prostate cancer every 19 minutes.

Mar 04, 2010 3:07pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.