Senate breaks logjam to restore jobless aid

Related Topics

Ester Dela Cruz, laid off nine months ago from her job as an elderly care worker, searches for employment at a jobs center in San Francisco, California in this February 4, 2010 file photo. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith/Files

Ester Dela Cruz, laid off nine months ago from her job as an elderly care worker, searches for employment at a jobs center in San Francisco, California in this February 4, 2010 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith/Files

WASHINGTON | Wed Mar 3, 2010 5:52am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Highway money and jobless funds were set to flow again after the Senate ended a standoff on Tuesday that disrupted benefits for hundreds of thousands of unemployed Americans.

The Senate voted 78-19 to end a logjam that had worsened the plight of the jobless and thrown thousands out of work as lawmakers bickered over the cost of programs designed to help millions of Americans weather the worst economic downturn in 70 years.

President Barack Obama was expected to sign the measure quickly into law.

The programs expired on Sunday after Republican Senator Jim Bunning prevented the Senate from renewing them on the grounds they would add to the country's $12.4 trillion debt.

As a result, 400,000 jobless people faced the imminent loss of weekly checks that help them pay the bills while they look for work, as well as subsidies that help them pay for health insurance.

Construction projects across the country shut down after 2,000 federal workers were furloughed, while doctors faced a 21 percent pay cut for patients they see under the Medicare health insurance program for the elderly.

"During these difficult economic times, supporting American workers, their families and our small businesses must be everyone's focus," Obama said in a statement released by the White House. "... I'm grateful to the members of the Senate on both sides of the aisle who worked to end this roadblock to relief for America's working families."

In news conferences and floor statements, Democrats said Bunning and his fellow Republicans had taken their opposition to Democratic initiatives to a new extreme.

"Today we have a clear-cut example to show the American people what's wrong with Washington," said Democratic Senator Patty Murray.

The dispute echoed a 1995 standoff that shut down large chunks of the federal government as Democratic President Bill Clinton and congressional Republicans battled over the budget.

REPUBLICANS ACTED TO END STANDOFF

Mindful of a possible backlash from recession-weary voters, Republicans moved on Tuesday to end the standoff.

The agreement enabled Bunning to propose a tax measure to cover the bill's $10 billion tab, but Democrats used budget rules to prevent it coming up for a vote. Many noted that Bunning had refused an identical offer a week ago, fearing it would fail.

"He was offered this choice last week, he wouldn't take it last week," said Dick Durbin, the Senate's No. 2 Democrat. "As a result, a lot of people have suffered."

Many Republicans said they agreed with Bunning's point about spending but did not necessarily support his methods, and few came to the Senate floor to defend Bunning as he endured hours of Democratic criticism.

"I don't think I've spent this much time on the floor in any one week, period, in my life," Bunning said.

A Hall of Fame baseball pitcher with a prickly reputation, Bunning plans to retire this year after Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, a fellow Kentuckian, discouraged him from running for re-election.

The standoff gave Democrats an opportunity to shift the focus from their own struggles to advance legislation that aims to reduce the 9.7 percent U.S. unemployment rate, which they say is their top priority this year.

With the temporary programs renewed, Democrats moved to a much larger $150 billion measure that would extend jobless benefits through the end of the year, help states pay rising health insurance costs and renew a popular set of tax breaks for businesses and individuals.

But their first jobs bill, a $15 billion package centered on tax breaks for businesses that hire new workers, faced an uncertain fate in the House of Representatives.

Democratic leaders in that chamber face objections from black lawmakers who say it is too paltry and centrists who say it violates budget rules.

(Editing by Peter Cooney and Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (50)
drewmcd621 wrote:
Who are the other 18 that voted against it?

Mar 02, 2010 9:40pm EST  --  Report as abuse
sloppyjoe1973 wrote:
Akaka (D-HI), Yea
Alexander (R-TN), Nay
Barrasso (R-WY), Nay
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Begich (D-AK), Yea
Bennet (D-CO), Yea
Bennett (R-UT), Nay
Bingaman (D-NM), Yea
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Boxer (D-CA), Yea
Brown (D-OH), Yea
Brown (R-MA), Yea
Brownback (R-KS), Yea
Bunning (R-KY), Nay
Burr (R-NC), Nay
Burris (D-IL), Yea
Byrd (D-WV), Not Voting
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Cardin (D-MD), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Casey (D-PA), Yea
Chambliss (R-GA), Yea
Coburn (R-OK), Nay
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Collins (R-ME), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Corker (R-TN), Nay
Cornyn (R-TX), Nay
Crapo (R-ID), Nay
DeMint (R-SC), Nay
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Durbin (D-IL), Yea
Ensign (R-NV), Nay
Enzi (R-WY), Nay
Feingold (D-WI), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Franken (D-MN), Yea
Gillibrand (D-NY), Yea
Graham (R-SC), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Nay
Hagan (D-NC), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Nay
Hutchison (R-TX), Not Voting
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Yea
Isakson (R-GA), Yea
Johanns (R-NE), Nay
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kaufman (D-DE), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Klobuchar (D-MN), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Not Voting
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
LeMieux (R-FL), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Yea
Lieberman (ID-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
McCaskill (D-MO), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Nay
Menendez (D-NJ), Yea
Merkley (D-OR), Yea
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Pryor (D-AR), Yea
Reed (D-RI), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Risch (R-ID), Nay
Roberts (R-KS), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Sanders (I-VT), Yea
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Sessions (R-AL), Nay
Shaheen (D-NH), Yea
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Specter (D-PA), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea
Tester (D-MT), Yea
Thune (R-SD), Nay
Udall (D-CO), Yea
Udall (D-NM), Yea
Vitter (R-LA), Yea
Voinovich (R-OH), Yea
Warner (D-VA), Yea
Webb (D-VA), Yea
Whitehouse (D-RI), Yea
Wicker (R-MS), Yea
Wyden (D-OR), Yea

Notice EVERY Nay vote is a Republican.

Mar 02, 2010 10:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
JKHamlin wrote:
Every nay vote is one of the good guys. People are suffering now as a result of 5 years of Democrat run Congress. More Democrat tax and spend, spend, spend legislation is NOT what we need more of. Bunning, apparently, is the only senator that gets it. Thank you, Sen Bunning, you’re a hero!

Mar 02, 2010 10:30pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.