McCain, Lieberman push military to handle terror cases

Related Topics

Senators John McCain (R) and Joe Lieberman talk during a news conference in Sarajevo in this February 5, 2010 file photo. REUTERS/Danilo Krstanovic

Senators John McCain (R) and Joe Lieberman talk during a news conference in Sarajevo in this February 5, 2010 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Danilo Krstanovic

WASHINGTON | Fri Mar 5, 2010 12:18pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Two senior senators unveiled legislation on Thursday to require the military to hold, interrogate and prosecute certain terrorism suspects and also bar them from receiving legal rights afforded most criminals in the United States.

Republican Senator John McCain and Independent Senator Joe Lieberman offered the measure in the wake of the controversy over prosecuting the accused Christmas Day airplane bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, in a U.S. criminal court instead of a military trial.

Under the proposed legislation, individuals who are deemed to be "suspected unprivileged enemy belligerents" would be held in military custody, interrogated for possible intelligence and tried in a military court.

A special team, known as the High-Value Interrogation Team, would recommend which suspects would be sent to the military and the final decision would be made by the U.S. attorney general and Defense Department secretary, according to the proposed legislation.

"These are not common criminals. They are war criminals and they should be treated according to the rules of the law of war," Lieberman told reporters.

The Obama administration has been under fire by Republicans for handling most suspects through the traditional criminal justice system as well as advising them of their legal rights to have an attorney and remain silent during questioning.

Abdulmutallab, who tried to blow up a commercial airliner with a bomb hidden in his clothes, was interrogated by FBI agents for about an hour before he stopped cooperating and he was then read his legal rights. Authorities later determined he had worked with al Qaeda militants in Yemen.

McCain questioned whether valuable intelligence was lost when Abdulmutallab stopped talking. "Americans are deeply disturbed by these failures. We are disturbed too," he said.

Obama officials have defended their handling of terrorism suspects, including Abdulmutallab, noting that they obtained valuable intelligence from him even though he was given full U.S. legal rights and charged in a criminal court.

They have also expressed concerns that some proposals in Congress could delay interrogations of suspects and that prosecutorial discretion has been a function of the executive branch and Congress should not restrict it.

President Barack Obama's fellow Democrats control both the Senate and House of Representatives, which could make it tough for the proposed legislation to move forward. However, some Democrats have backed efforts to require that the military deal with terrorism suspects.

Administration officials had no immediate comment on the proposal.

(Additional reporting by Thomas Ferraro, editing by David Alexander)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Reuty wrote:
Then they definitely should be impeached for high treason.

Mar 05, 2010 1:11pm EST  --  Report as abuse
BHOShatOnUS wrote:
When liberals attack! McCain and Lieberman going after one of their own!!! This is great! Obama will have no friends when it’s all over.

I hope Obama fails. The only good thing Obama has done since his coronation is to let the military deal with those Somali pirates.

Mar 05, 2010 3:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.