Obama keeps U.S. troop withdrawal plan after Iraq poll

Related Topics

President Barack Obama (R), standing with Vice President Joe Biden, gives remarks on the parliamentary election in Iraq, in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, March 7, 2010. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

President Barack Obama (R), standing with Vice President Joe Biden, gives remarks on the parliamentary election in Iraq, in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, March 7, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

WASHINGTON | Sun Mar 7, 2010 5:16pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama called Iraq's election an "important milestone" on Sunday despite deadly violence, praising Iraqi security forces and repeating his end-2011 goal for removing all U.S. troops from the country.

Scores of mortar rounds, rockets and roadside bombs exploded near polling stations across Iraq, killing 38 people, in an apparent effort to scare voters participating in the election for Iraq's second full-term parliament since the 2003 U.S. invasion.

Obama praised millions of Iraqis for turning out to vote despite the attacks.

"As expected, there were some incidents of violence as al Qaeda in Iraq and other extremists tried to disrupt Iraq's progress by murdering innocent Iraqis who were exercising their democratic rights," Obama told reporters at the White House.

"But overall the level of security and the prevention of destabilizing attacks speaks to the growing capability and professionalism of Iraqi security forces, which took the lead in providing protection at the polls," he said.

Obama's emphasis on Iraqi security forces' success supports his argument that U.S. troops can leave the country on time, freeing the president to put his foreign policy focus more squarely on the war in Afghanistan.

If the election were to trigger a repeat of the sectarian bloodletting that killed tens of thousands of Iraqis in 2006-2007, Obama may be forced to rethink his timetable.

TROOP WITHDRAWAL ON TIME

"We will continue with the responsible removal of the United States forces from Iraq," Obama said, repeating that the U.S. combat mission would conclude at the end of August.

"We will continue to advise and assist Iraqi security forces, carry out targeted counterterrorism operations with our Iraqi partners and protect our forces and civilians. And by the end of the next year, all U.S. troops will be out of Iraq," he said.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates also praised the security forces and said turnout for the election was high.

"The Iraq security forces have performed superbly. And the turnout is as high, if not higher than, earlier expectations. So all in all, a good day for the Iraqis and for all of us," Gates told reporters, citing information he had received from the top U.S. commander in Iraq, General Ray Odierno.

Obama noted Iraq would have difficult days ahead with further violence likely. He said he was mindful the electoral process was not over and that ballots must be counted, complaints heard, a parliament seated and leaders chosen.

"In this process, the United States does not support particular candidates or coalitions," he said.

"But like any sovereign, independent nation, Iraq must be free to chart its own course. No one should seek to influence, exploit, or disrupt this period of transition. Now is the time for every neighbor and nation to respect Iraq's sovereignty and territorial integrity."

(additional reporting by David Lawder and Phil Stewart)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
ApostasyUSA wrote:
Good.

No more wasting trillions in a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.

Iraq is a fools war. An invasion and occupation for unknown reasons– because lets face it —catching an old fool like Saddam that we had pretty much surrounded is a real bad reason to get 100,000 Iraqi civilians killed. Saddam was worthless by then, except for his countries access to resources.

We might not own Iraq but we certainly are paying for it in the tune of 2 trillion tax dollars. I think the Iraq war was probably about profit for some big British and US companies.

Mar 07, 2010 5:30pm EST  --  Report as abuse
getsix wrote:
its odd he pays attention to polls in Iraq but not in his own country

Mar 07, 2010 6:21pm EST  --  Report as abuse
sonomes222 wrote:
Iraq one of the bigist mistakes in us history along with electing Bush W

Mar 07, 2010 6:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.