EU faces court challenge over biofuel reports

Related Topics

BRUSSELS | Tue Mar 9, 2010 4:54am EST

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Four environmental groups have sued the European Union's executive for withholding documents they say will add to a growing dossier of evidence that biofuels harm the environment and push up food prices.

The lawsuit, lodged with the EU's General Court, the bloc's second highest court, alleges several violations of European laws on transparency and democracy.

But the European Commission countered that the action was premature as it had not formally refused access and had already released many of the 8,000 pages requested.

The suit was filed on Monday by ClientEarth, Transport & Environment, the European Environmental Bureau, and BirdLife International.

"That the Commission should choose to deny our rights on such a critical issue as the science underpinning our climate policies is astounding," said Tim Grabiel, staff attorney at ClientEarth.

At stake is the EU's commitment to its goal of getting a tenth of its road fuels from renewable sources such as biofuels by 2020 -- a target that has spawned an EU industry worth around 5 billion euros ($6.8 billion) a year and a big market for imports from Brazil, Indonesia and Malaysia.

The four groups first sought access to the documents on October 15, and said the European Commission missed a legal deadline to release them under freedom of information laws on February 9. Some reports have been released, but not all.

"Formally, the applicant is entitled to bring these proceedings," said Commission spokesman Mark Gray. "However, we made it perfectly clear that we are not rejecting her application, but are carrying out a concrete and individual assessment of the requested documents."

"The issue is whether the Commission can be expected to handle such bulky and complex requests within the normal time frames," Gray added.

A similar request by Reuters has led to the release of 118 reports and e-mails, which reveal worries within the Commission that the EU set its 10 percent goal before fully assessing the impact of biofuel targets.

MAKING MATTERS WORSE

Some of the documents raise the prospect of higher EU farm incomes, but cite concerns that plant-based biofuels could create food shortages for the world's poorest.

Others suggest biofuels can drive up demand for land, encouraging farmers in tropical areas to expand cropland into sensitive areas such as wetlands and rainforests -- which would have a detrimental impact on the environment.

Burning forests can release enough carbon dioxide to cancel out any benefits sought from the biofuels.

One leaked email says that taking account of biofuels' full carbon footprint could "kill" their role in the EU.

"Current EU biofuels policy guarantees that Europe will use lots of biofuels, but it doesn't guarantee reductions in greenhouse gas emissions -- in fact it seems likely it will make things worse," said Nusa Urbancic of transport campaign group T&E.

"The first step to fixing this broken policy must be full transparency about what the true impacts are," she said.

The case is not the Commission's only wrangle with environment groups over access to environmental documents.

The EU's internal watchdog, ombudsman P. Nikiforos Diamandouros, recently criticized the Commission for not releasing three letters that German car company Porsche had sent to former industry commissioner Guenther Verheugen.

The case originated with a complaint from Friends of the Earth Europe, which was trying to get hold of the documents as part of the debate over legislation to curb carbon emissions from cars.

(Reporting by Pete Harrison; Editing by Amanda Cooper)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
BIOblogger wrote:
Before suing to halt biofuel developments for impacts they can only imagine it would seem prudent to run a similar environmental impact assessment on the status quo fossil paradigm that we can measure with certainty. We can fight forever over the purity of a given alternative, comparing it to some mythical ideal, but unless the environmentalists are willing to take responsibility for backing the current global addiction to fossil fuels, they should withhold litigation against promising attempts to provide alternatives.

Change will have impacts and early steps will no doubt be messy. We can’t afford to sacrifice good alternatives on the altar of idealistic speculations.

I have much more faith in the innovation of farmers, ranchers, and foresters to solve energy/food problems than obstructionists who find naysaying so appealing.

Mar 08, 2010 8:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.