U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Medication fears lead to worse side effects

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Tue Mar 9, 2010 5:17pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - It may not be surprising, but a new study offers some proof that patients who are worried about their medications are more likely to have side effects from them.

The study involved patients with a particular kind of arthritis. While more research has to be done in patients with other illnesses to know for sure, "my guess would be that this is happening across a wide range of drugs," Dr. Yvonne Nestoriuc of Philipps-University Marburg in Germany, the study's lead author, told Reuters Health. "This is really something that happens in a lot of patient populations."

While most medication side effects are not life threatening or seriously harmful, she and her colleagues note in the journal Arthritis Care & Research, they can still be "frightening and distressing" to patients, and can also lead to patients not taking drugs as recommended.

People with a variety of illnesses who don't feel their medications are necessary and are concerned about their side effects are known to be less likely to take these drugs as directed, the researchers add.

To investigate whether these beliefs might be related to experiencing side effects as well, Nestoriuc and her team had 100 rheumatoid arthritis patients complete the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, which explores general and specific beliefs about the necessity and risks of medication. Patients also reported on any side effects related to their rheumatoid arthritis medication and on how much they were bothered by these symptoms.

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation that leads to stiff, swollen and painful joints. It affects some 20 million people, according to the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society.

At the study's outset, 77 of the patients reported having been bothered by side effects. Eighty-seven of the original 100 study participants were followed up at six months; 45 of these patients, or 52 percent, reported being bothered by side effects at this point.

The patients who had concerns about their medications, for example agreeing with the statement that "having to take arthritis medications worries me," were more likely to have reported having side effects, both at the study's outset and if they started a new drug during the six-month study period. Side effects typically included rashes, gastrointestinal discomfort, and headaches.

These patients were also more likely to report these side effects to their doctors, take non-prescription medications to deal with them, and change their medication dosages on their own. The only other factor that influenced the likelihood of reporting side effects was age.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis "who are especially concerned about their arthritis medications, or who expect side effects, are at greater risk of experiencing them," the researchers say.

"Starting a new drug is a specifically risky time because people tend to misattribute pre-existing bothersome but non-harmful symptoms as side effects of the new drug," Nestoriuc said.

Doctors may be able to help their patients avoid side effects by talking with them about their concerns before prescribing a new medication, she added, and helping them to get a more "realistic view about the drugs."

SOURCE: Arthritis Care & Research, online February 26, 2010.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Margaret87 wrote:
Oh dear. So now some of these side effects are our fault, presumably we ought to accept everything we’re told and just not worry.

My distrust of toxic drugs led me to take low dose naltrexone (LDN) – it’s controlling my RA and has shrunk a carcindoid tumour in my guts I didn’t know I had – nor did the doctors and toxic drugs could have made it worse.

LDN has made my immune system healthy so it deals with attacks on my body in the normal way – and its effectiveness and safety record is second to none. We’re campaigning to get governments to fund trials for this off patent treatment in Scotland, Ireland, England and Wales.

Mar 10, 2010 9:00am EST  --  Report as abuse
ravensegg wrote:
This seems like a poorly controlled and interpreted study to me. For instance, there is a major chicken-or-egg issue here. It is likely that people who have had a history of getting adverse side effects from drugs (many of us are sensitive and/or allergic to a lot of things, including drugs) are more likely to fear the possible onset of adverse side effects. It’s not the anxiety that is causing the side effects, and it’s not that they are misdiagnosing symptoms – they are simply reacting to what they have historically experienced.

In order to come to any legitimate conclusion from a study, there have to be controls – were there any controls in this study, in order to filter out people who have a history of being legitimately chemically sensitive/allergic?

Mar 10, 2010 12:54pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Margaret87 wrote:
Another flaw in the research, as I see it, is the length of the study. It would be interesting to see follow ups in 1 year, then 18 months, 2 years plus.

But the medications used aren’t mentioned either. Rheumatoid arthritis is the immune system attacking the body. Most drugs prescribed suppress the inflammation or the immune system. That can sooner or later lead to further problems.

If a patient understands this and does not feel it’s what’s needed, they won’t be happy with the drug. Such patients have the right to be sceptical and already have a “realistic” notion of what the drugs do.

Mar 10, 2010 3:06pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.