FDA rules out bisphosphonate, thigh fracture link

Related Topics

BOSTON | Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:33pm EST

BOSTON (Reuters) - U.S. regulators said on Wednesday they have found no link between oral bisphosphonate osteoporosis medications such as Merck & Co Inc's Fosamax and certain thigh bone fractures.

The Food and Drug Administration issued its statement following the publication of case reports of atypical subtrochanteric femur fractures -- or fractures in the bone just below the hip joint -- in women with osteoporosis using oral bisphosphonates.

Bisphosphonates are a class of drug aimed at preventing bone fractures and offsetting bone loss associated with menopause.

They include Fosamax, Roche Holding AG's Boniva, Novartis AG's Reclast and Procter and Gamble Co's Actonel.

In June 2008, the FDA requested information from all bisphosphonate drug makers related to these type of fractures. The agency said a review of the data did not show an increased risk for women using the medications.

The FDA said that, although its review of the data did not show a clear connection between bisphosphonates and atypical subtrochanteric femur fractures, the agency is working closely with outside experts to gain more insight into the issue.

Bisphosphonates, which have been on the market for roughly a decade, have raised safety concerns in the past, including heart risks.

But in 2008, the FDA said the drugs showed no overall risk of heart problems. The agency's review followed reports in the New England Journal of Medicine of serious atrial fibrillation, a type of abnormal heartbeat.

In January, a Manhattan federal judge refused to dismiss a lawsuit alleging that Fosamax caused jaw damage to a woman during the nearly eight years she took the pill.

Merck faces a slew of lawsuits involving almost 900 cases by patients who say Fosamax caused osteonecrosis of the jaw, or death of jaw bone tissue.

"In clinical studies, Fosamax has not been associated with increased fracture risk at any skeletal site," Merck spokesman Ron Rogers said in a statement.

"Low energy femoral shaft and subtrochanteric fractures have been reported in the medical literature as occurring in non-bisphosphonate users," Rogers noted, adding that Merck is currently conducting studies "to further investigate the issue of low energy femoral shaft and subtrochanteric fractures."

The FDA recommended patients keep taking their medication unless told not to by their doctor. It also recommended that healthcare professionals be aware of a "possible risk" of atypical subtrochanteric femur fractures in patients taking oral bisphosphonates.

(Reporting by Toni Clarke; additional reporting by Bill Berkrot in New York; editing by Andre Grenon)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Sciguybm wrote:
As a cell biologist and a chemist I am often amazed that the FDA, EPA, USDA and other federal regulating groups do not have anyone who can do simple chemistry on a review board.
Short and simple folks: adding more phosphorus to the body systems increases, increases, the need for calcium everywhere the phosphorus goes and hence INCREASES calcium migration FROM the bones.
Oh, did I mention PhD level cell biologist & chemist?

Mar 11, 2010 10:52am EST  --  Report as abuse
SuefromSault wrote:
I am only a BA chemist but I read the SCIENTIFIC literature and have chosen to increase exercise, Vit D3, and Calcium intake rather than take these expensive and dangerous meds. The guy above is right on! (Note I am F, 70+, and avoid any med which is heavily advertised on TV) The pattern is this: 1) New med comes out. 2) Science (AAS pub) Magazine carries research reports finding excessive dangers. 3) Advertising on TV increases. 4) About 2 years later the law suits start. 5) CEOs in company “retire” with big bonuses.

Mar 11, 2010 11:25am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.