Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.

Deficit borrowing to rise for states, cities

CHICAGO | Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:03pm EST

CHICAGO (Reuters) - U.S. states and cities may increasingly turn to deficit borrowing to deal with still sagging tax revenue and the pending loss of federal stimulus money.

"With the fiscal pressures mounting, states are turning to any financing mechanism at their disposal to manage those pressures," said Ted Hampton, an analyst at Moody's Investors Service.

Despite glimmers of an economic recovery, state and local government funds are expected to remain sparse for some time. Meanwhile, the $863 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act will largely shut off the federal funding spigot to states at year end.

States and cities left with huge budget holes and fewer remedies in terms of additional spending cuts or politically unpopular tax increases may find deficit borrowing is their only choice. But this move will invite tougher scrutiny by rating agencies looking for issuers to produce long-term solutions to structural budget imbalances.

"We look closely at how deficit bond issuance fits in with the overall debt profile and the percentage of the budget solution," said Robin Prunty, a Standard & Poor's Ratings Services analyst.

Following the 2001 recession, states engaged in nearly $30 billion of deficit borrowing, including debt restructurings, asset securitizations and debt to fund current pension costs, according to a December report by Standard & Poor's. For the current recession, the rating agency estimated more than $15 billion of that debt will be sold in an 18-month period, noting that federal stimulus money has limited states' need for this kind of issuance so far.

"As the stimulus funds diminish, we expect this trend to change," the report said, adding however that many states are prohibited from deficit borrowing.

For example, New Jersey, which faces a big budget gap, can no longer sell long-term deficit bonds after the state supreme court in 2004 put an end to the practice after allowing one final sale.

Issuers hope that the economy and their revenue will perk up enough in future years to pay off the debt and cover current operating costs.

NEW YORK EYES DEFICIT BONDS

New York Lieutenant Governor Richard Ravitch this week proposed a plan to deal with a five-year, $60 billion structural deficit that includes selling about $2 billion of bonds a year, perhaps for three years.

But there would be strict controls on the debt, which could not be issued if a state control board determined that the deficit was not being closed quickly enough, for example. New York has relied on deficit borrowing in the past, including the sale of bonds backed by the state's share of tobacco settlement revenue to help close a fiscal 2004 deficit, according to the state budget office.

Illinois in early January sold $3.46 billion of taxable five-year bonds to make its fiscal 2010 payment to state pension funds. With the state facing a $13 billion deficit heading into fiscal 2011, the budget plan unveiled by Governor Pat Quinn on Wednesday would turn to various types of borrowing to deal with $4.7 billion of the gap.

Detroit on Thursday sold nearly $250 million of so-called fiscal stabilization bonds that are a key component in the city's plan to eliminate a $326 million cumulative deficit.

Ohio's two-year budget relied on $736 million in cash-flow relief produced by a series of recent restructurings of state debt.

A bill in the Massachusetts Legislature would allow the city of Lawrence to issue up to $35 million of debt with state oversight to deal with its deficit.

(Reporting by Karen Pierog, additional reporting by Joan Gralla in New York; Editing by Kenneth Barry)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
dooinok wrote:
States are dying a slow death. The below jobs plan is needed to turn this train around. Pass it on…please.
Below is the key and most viable initiative to return people back to work. It’s time for bold action…a specific plan…targeting a specific group…for a specific issue….job creation. This initiative will literally create 1 to 3 million+ job opportunities utilizing existing programs and funding. To ignore such an initiative is truly an injustice to the jobless and their families.

Plan: Allow seniors age 62-64 who have NOT yet enrolled in Social Security to be Medicare eligible if they retire early. Our survey shows vast majority of these targeted seniors continue to work or seek employment for employer health insurance… with plans to retire at age 65…when Medicare eligible. The KEY is to speed attrition of these seniors from the labor pool by allowing Medicare eligibility. A time sensitive program…a 30-90 day window of opportunity for these seniors to decide if they would take advantage of this Medicare incentive or continue to work. A vast number would retire creating vast opportunities for the jobless. Healthy seniors would be NO additional cost to Medicare. This plan will produce results unmatched by any stimulus… past or present…using existing programs and funds.

Bonus For Business: Our survey had employers applauding such an initiative for these seniors. Why? Their response was unanimous…Retiring senior employees would be replaced by entry level…lesser salary and benefited employees. Examples given: New employees earning $3-$5 less/hour than the exiting seniors would result in business payroll saving $5,000-$10,000 per year/per new hire…for a number of years. This is the bottom line help business needs…and this Medicare incentive would deliver this help.

Why Plan Is So Critical: Consumer/business confidence very low. Consumers not spending…business will not hire until a sustained increase in demand for their product/service. Worker productivity is up and seniors are working longer. These will all make job recovery very difficult and may take years! The solution is this Medicare incentive to early retiring seniors…their vacated positions are needed now.

Social Security/Medicare: The CBO has stated SS is running a surplus…taking in more than pays out and is funded to 2037. Medicare is funded to 2018 and stated both programs will need to be re-structured and strengthened in the future. Returning the jobless to work will again have them contributing into these programs…generating critical tax revenues for the states.These two programs…SS and Medicare are tools that should be used now to speed senior attrition…create vast job opportunities…provide business a real payroll incentive.

It Doesn’t Stop With The Jobless: It goes far beyond the current unemployed. There are additional millions of under-employed…graduates ready to begin their careers…returning military personnel…and students looking for their first job. 460,000 people lost their jobs last month…How many may have retained their jobs if senior co-workers were allowed this Medicare incentive and retired under this jobs program?

Mar 12, 2010 2:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Jarlent wrote:
OR you could just adopt Texas’ ideas.

We’re doing fine, we had a little shortfall last year, but hey, whatever. If it came down to it, we can drum up alot more money.

Look to Texas for ideas, not California or New York!

We’re not bankrupt, we are just consistently kind of poor.

Mar 12, 2010 3:24pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.