UPDATE 2-WaMu deal resolves fallout from record bank failure
* WaMu, JPMorgan and FDIC resolve disputes
* WaMu gets nearly all of $4 bln deposit
* JPMorgan and WaMu to split $3 bln tax refund 70-30
* FDIC and WaMu to split $2.6 bln tax refund 60-40 (New throughout)
By Tom Hals
WILMINGTON, Del., March 12 (Reuters) - Washington Mutual Inc (WAMUQ.PK) said on Friday that it reached a deal that will bring it roughly $6 billion and help resolve its bankruptcy, but it could leave shareholders in the cold.
The company, which is tied to the biggest bank failure in U.S. history, will gain ownership of a bank deposit that is worth about $4 billion. JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) also had claimed the deposit.
It also agreed to split two potential tax refunds worth a combined $5.6 billion with JPMorgan and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
While the transaction brings the three parties into agreement for the first time after 18 months of legal battles, it sets up the next likely fight: the deal depends on the disallowance of billions of dollars in claims by holders of bonds issued by Washington Mutual Bank.
The company recognizes $7 billion in general unsecured claims stemming from Washington Mutual notes, although more than $100 billion of claims have been lodged. The money brought into the estate will go to paying off creditors.
Shareholders also are likely to fight the agreement. An attorney for the official committee of equity holders told the court that nobody told him about the settlement.
Shares of Washington Mutual common stock fell as much as 70 percent after the deal was announced. Preferred shares, which have a higher-priority claim on the company's assets, rose 9 percent.
Shares of JPMorgan were little changed at $43.37 in afternoon trade.
The Seattle-based Washington Mutual filed for bankruptcy in September 2008, during the same financial crisis that felled Lehman Brothers Holding Inc, Merrill Lynch and banks across Europe. Washington Mutual's jittery depositors yanked nearly 10 percent of the bank's $188 billion in deposits in a matter of days, prompting regulators to seize the operation.
After it was seized, the FDIC sold the bank to JPMorgan (JPM.N) for $1.9 billion.
Friday's deal will return a bank deposit worth about $4 billion to Washington Mutual, minus $172 million.
The deposit was also claimed by JPMorgan which had described Washington Mutual's bookkeeping as a "shell game" and said money might have been a capital contribution that allowed the bank to meet regulatory requirements.
The deal also splits the company's two expected tax refunds. Washington Mutual agreed to receive $900 million of a $2.6 billion expected return, with the rest going to JPMorgan. A second $2.6 billion return will be bring in $1.04 billion for Washington Mutual with the rest going to the FDIC.
The company's reorganization plan is really a plan for distributing assets to creditors. Little will remain of the company that was founded in 1889 to help fund the rebuilding of central Seattle after a devastating fire.
Most of what was once 2,200 branches and 40,000 staff as well as books and records are now in the hands of JPMorgan.
The company's seizure and bankruptcy have been steeped in controversy and become fodder for conspiracy theories, particularly among shareholders.
The bank said in court documents that JPMorgan may have leaked information to regulators that led to its collapse. It cited records from other court cases that suggested JPMorgan had planted "mole" employees at Washington Mutual to glean information.
As part of the agreement, Washington Mutual will not pursue litigation over its collapse against JPMorgan or the FDIC.
The case has also realigned what passes for the natural order of things in bankruptcy, with JPMorgan fighting against hedge funds that hold the company's bonds.
In most other large bankruptcies such as Readers Digest [RPPLER.UL] and Tribune Co (TRBCQ.PK), JPMorgan has been a tough negotiator on behalf of hedge funds, who it depends on to buy the securitized loans it generates.
The company said it will finalize the agreement and include it in a plan of reorganization it expects to file with the Delaware bankruptcy court by the end of March.
The case is In re Washington Mutual Inc, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware (Wilmington), No. 08-12229. (Reporting by Tom Hals. Editing by Robert MacMillan)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Think about it, if it’s not that Weil/WMI BOD are colluding with JPM and FDIC in this kind of deal, what could it be? WMI is suing JPM and FDIC, but now paying the two defendants billions to settle the case? What about the discovered items from JPM’s document productions? What about the $20 B liquidated claims against JPM? What about the $14B liquidated claims against FDIC? What about the $5.6B tax refunds from NOLs? What about the likely favorable $4B SJ? What about the tight disparity between WMI’s As and Ls?
WMI creditors are easily paid in full, but they don’t want par only. WMI creditors with WMI BOD want to shaft WMI equities. Weil and A&M are helping them by hiding assets and compromising the unnecessary compromises. It’s fraud and pathetics to their reputatioin in the industry.
$4B deposit was WMI’s. FDIC wrongfully seized it and transferred it to JPM. From times to times, WMI’s BK legal counsel delayed the $4B deposit SJ and intentionally left the money in the hostile party’s hand. In this case, JPM is deemed to be the hostile party. Weil represents JPM in other cases. It’s clear conflict of interest. How can Weil represents WMI in the litigation settlement negotiation with JPM and FDIC? Hell no.
$5.6B is WMI’s. As per that WMI has received the first tax refunds from IRS proves it’s legitimate ownership status to the tax refunds. Another $2.6 is forecoming. Why and how can Weil/WMI BOD voluntarily annouce that they are willing to give WMI’s own tax refunds to JPM and FDIC. First, JPM bought all WMB assets and assumed little liabilities and payed only $1.9B. Now they got $4B cleear preferred trust and $2.1B tax refund cash?? What a great deal! Well done Weil. Second, FDIC said the WaMu deal cost it naught. Then what WMI gives FDIC $1.4B tax refund cash in the second part of the IRS refunds?? It’s not even logical to an elementary student. They don’t sum up AT ALL.
What about other claims against JPM and FDIC? All gone? So who is suing whom? JPM and FDIC are suing WMI or the opposite?
Be advised that WMI is suing JPM and FDIC for totalling $34B liquidated claims. Ladies and gentlmen, please take further notice that such a settlement annouced in court by snaky lawyer is not legally binding. He can say whatever within legal domain he wants. Without the consent of WMI EC, any settlement is void, any POR is poof.
C.
Follow Reuters