Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Obama, Medvedev happy on arms pact, signing seen near

Related Topics

MOSCOW | Sat Mar 13, 2010 5:01pm EST

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and President Barack Obama are satisfied with the "high level of consensus" on a new pact to cut nuclear arms and it is now possible to talk of a firm date for signing a treaty, the Kremlin said on Saturday.

Russia and the United States have been negotiating for nearly a year a new treaty to reduce their arsenals of nuclear weapons. The pact is a cornerstone of Washington's efforts to improve relations with Moscow.

Obama and Medvedev held a regular telephone conversation on Saturday and "expressed satisfaction with the high level of consensus on the basic lines of the project of the treaty," the Kremlin press service said in a statement.

It was "underlined that already now it was possible to talk about concrete dates for presenting the (arms treaty) for signing by the heads of states," the statement added. It did not give any date.

In Washington, a White House spokesman said Obama and Medvedev had a "good conversation," reviewing progress in negotiations thus far. "Both leaders are committed to concluding an agreement soon," said Mike Hammer, spokesman for the White House's National Security Council.

Obama and Medvedev launched the arms talks in April of last year as part of a U.S.-inspired attempt to "reset" relations after years of bitter discord under the Bush administration.

The leaders originally set a deadline of December of last year for a new pact -- the same month as an existing arms control treaty, START II, expired.

But talks bogged down amid differences over verification measures and ways of counting weapons and launch systems in the complex treaty. Negotiations have continued up until now in the Swiss city of Geneva.

The two leaders have been under pressure to reach an agreement before a nuclear security summit planned by Obama in Washington next month.

Obama and Medvedev agreed to give their delegations additional instructions for the talks and discussed plans for bilateral contacts in the near future, the statement added.

(Reporting by Dmitry Sergeyev in Moscow, additional reporting by Ross Colvin in Washington, writing by Michael Stott; editing by Matthew Jones and Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
ImIn2Jazz wrote:
Do any of you remember during the 1980’s when our landbased ICBM’s appeared to be at risk. The proposal was to have a railroad system to keep our arsenal on the move. The doctrine of MAD (mutually assured destruction) was in play. The staggering amount of money we in the US have spent to produce and stockpile these weapons is disheartening, but effective. An all out nuclear exchange between Russia and the US now, is less than remote. Now both sides are faced with spending enormous amounts of money to dismantle the stockpile of nuclear weapons. My hope is both leaders continue down the current path, a step in the right direction.

Mar 13, 2010 2:41pm EST  --  Report as abuse
AlitoRAF wrote:
Good to see two socialist nations are happy with one another. Sure, we all trust Russia.
Any more deasls like this and Mr OB and we’ll have to consider watering you.

Mar 13, 2010 3:44pm EST  --  Report as abuse
STORY-BURN wrote:
Russia is toast…oil is so yesterday…NOT!

Mar 13, 2010 3:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.