Smart sanctions can support democratic change: U.S.

HOLLYWOOD, Florida Mon Mar 15, 2010 11:35am EDT

A medical student of Cuba's ELAM (Latin American School of Medicine) studies in the campus library on the outskirts of Havana March 11, 2010. REUTERS/Desmond Boylan

A medical student of Cuba's ELAM (Latin American School of Medicine) studies in the campus library on the outskirts of Havana March 11, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Desmond Boylan

Related Topics

HOLLYWOOD, Florida (Reuters) - Adjusting and even selectively loosening U.S. sanctions against countries like Iran and Cuba can serve foreign policy goals by encouraging democratic change through greater Internet freedom and other means, a U.S. Treasury official said on Monday.

Adam Szubin, director of Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which enforces U.S. sanctions against designated states, companies and people, told a conference such "smart sanctions" would help the U.S. government further its goals of fostering greater freedom and democracy.

He said Washington last week adjusted its sanctions regimes against Iran, Cuba and Sudan to allow the export by U.S. companies of services and software related to personal communications over the Internet.

This was aimed at increasing the access of citizens in those states to online communications technologies.

"It's exactly what I think OFAC needs to be doing, not simply designating new targets or tightening sanctions, but also loosening sanctions when it can further our foreign policy goals," Szubin said in a keynote address to an international money laundering conference in Hollywood, Florida.

He cited the increased use over the last year of the Internet and social networking sites by opponents of Iran's government to disseminate their anti-government activities.

He said this activity, carried out through online sites and tools like Twitter, Facebook and instant messaging, removed any doubts "that personal communication software and its widespread availability are integral to seeing democratic change come to some of the most oppressive regimes on earth."

"So we are doing our part ... to open that world up to the people of Iran, to the people of Cuba and to the people of Sudan," Szubin said.

Iran remained a top priority in U.S. foreign policy and national security, he said, citing its "pursuit of weapons of mass destruction in contravention of repeated U.N. Security Council resolutions" and its "active role as a supporter of terrorism."

"There is no country in the world that is supporting terrorism as close to the level of Iran and its destabilizing role in the region, in funding, arming and fueling insurgencies and the Taliban," Szubin said.

He said OFAC would seek to make its overall sanctions enforcement more effective by clearly focusing and targeting its actions on major violators.

(Editing by John O'Callaghan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
BHOShatOnUS wrote:
It can be proven liberal internet access and open trade tends to lead to Marxist authoritarianism. That’s how we got Barack Hussein Obama, WhoShatOnUS. The internet spreads lies and deceit faster than the legacy media was able to do.

Mar 15, 2010 2:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
EFerrari wrote:
Smart sanctions are surely the way to go. I spoke with a businessman from Iran yesterday, who told me that the real impact of the Iranian Transactions Regulations was being felt by the people in Iran, not the government. He particularly spoke to the issue of how dangerous it is to fly on planes in Iran, because some of them are 40 years old or older and as a result of the sanctions against Iran, they are unable to get the right parts to repair and maintain these aircraft.

Iran’s population is rapidly seeking more democratic rights. There is no need to punish them with a country based sanctions program such as the Iranian Transactions Regulations. Sanctions need to be directly targeted towards those governments, entities, and individuals directly involved in activity detrimental to U.S. national security interests.

OFAC is taking the right approach in stating that they will be administering more smart sanctions, however, in practice, they are still heavily enforcing the Iranian Transactions Regulations, which is a country based sanctions program. If Director Szubin’s words are the beginning of a shift in policy then that certainly is a good thing.

I write on OFAC related issues at

Mar 16, 2010 12:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.