Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Flooding in India

Heavy monsoon rains have swollen several rivers.  Slideshow 

Photo

Celebrity portraits

Up close and personal with famous faces.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Afghanistan confirms blanket pardon for war crimes

Related Topics

KABUL | Tue Mar 16, 2010 10:06am EDT

KABUL (Reuters) - Afghanistan confirmed for the first time publicly on Tuesday that it had enacted into law a blanket pardon for war crimes and human rights abuse carried out before 2001.

Human rights groups have expressed dismay that the law appeared to have been enacted quietly, granting blanket immunity to members of all armed factions for acts committed during decades of war before the fall of the Taliban.

President Hamid Karzai had promised not to sign the National Stability and Reconciliation Law, when it was passed by parliament in 2007.

Human rights groups say they learned only this year that the bill had been published in the official gazette, making it law.

Karzai's spokesman, Waheed Omer, said on Tuesday that the bill had become law because it was passed by two-thirds of the parliament and therefore did not require Karzai's signature.

Parliament is made up largely of lawmakers from former armed groups, some accused by rights groups and ordinary Afghans of war crimes.

"This law was passed with a two-thirds majority in our parliament, and according to our constitution, when a law is passed with a two-thirds majority, it does not require the president to sign it," Omer told a briefing.

It was the first time the palace had confirmed that the measure had become law.

Brad Adams, Asia director for watchdog Human Rights Watch, said there was still mystery surrounding the process, and why it apparently took more than two years for news of the law's enactment to be made public.

"This law is absolute disgrace. It's a slap in the face to all the Afghans who suffered for years and years of war crimes and warlordism," Adams told Reuters.

He called on the international community and the United States to apply pressure on Afghanistan to repeal the law.

"The U.S. needs to decide whether they're with the victims or the perpetrators, and make their views known publicly," he said.

During Karzai's eight years in power, he has consistently included former commanders of armed factions in his government and inner circle, including many accused by the West of war crimes and other abuses.

Both of Karzai's two vice presidents are former leaders of armed groups whose factions squabbled for control of Kabul in the 1990s, when thousands of civilians were killed and hundreds of thousands fled their homes.

Supporters of the amnesty say prosecuting old allegations would risk restarting years of civil war. But critics say providing a blanket pardon for former warlords allows them to retain their grip over the economy and public life.

(Editing by Sugita Katyal)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Majick1 wrote:
WOW it didn’t take them long to catch on. They are just like the US excusing their genocide of the Native Americans and the mass murder of Japanese civilians at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Let’s not forget the illegal war in Iraq, without any sound reason, and the subsequent unnecessary loss of over 4000 brave military lives. One vote can change all that is immoral and unethical and make it all OK, Democracy works wonders doesn’t it?

Mar 16, 2010 11:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
My3cents wrote:
Human rights groups have never caught on that threatening people with a protracted trial and the rest of their life in prison is not a good way to get them to stop fighting.

Mar 16, 2010 7:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Irish67 wrote:
The Afghans can pardon whoever they want. The only pardon they’ll get from the US is a bullet.

Mar 17, 2010 9:39am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.