Iran's nuclear bomb effort has slowed: U.S. general

WASHINGTON Tue Mar 16, 2010 12:27pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. General David Petraeus said on Tuesday Iranian efforts to develop a nuclear weapon appear to have been delayed "a bit" and voiced confidence it would not have a bomb this year.

The comments by the head of the U.S. Central Command, which oversees wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, underscored the Obama administration's message to Israel and Gulf allies -- that there is time to pressure Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons program by imposing more economic sanctions.

U.S. President Barack Obama's top military advisers, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have been playing down the effectiveness of using military force against Iran.

"It has, thankfully, slid to the right a bit and it is not this calendar year, I don't think," Petraeus told a Senate panel when asked when Iran would have a nuclear weapon.

Iran denies it is seeking to build nuclear weapons.

Petraeus said while Obama had "explicitly stated that he has not taken the military option off the table," the administration's focus was on using different types of sanctions to get Tehran to change its behavior.

Petraeus has acknowledged that contingency planning was under way should Obama decide on military action but declined to discuss details during the open Senate hearing.

Last month, the U.S. director of national intelligence, Dennis Blair, said Iranian advancements in enriching uranium and other areas showed the government was "technically capable" of producing enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon in the "next few years, if it chooses to do so."

Blair cited information published by the International Atomic Energy Agency showing that the number of centrifuges installed at Iran's enrichment plant at Natanz had grown to more than 8,000 from about 3,000 in late 2007.

But he said Iran appeared to be "experiencing some problems" at Natanz and was operating only about half of the installed centrifuges, constraining its overall ability to produce larger quantities of low-enriched uranium.

It was not immediately clear if Petraeus was referring to those problems.

While the nuclear program may have been slowed, Iran continues to expand the scale, reach and sophistication of its ballistic missile forces, U.S. intelligence officials say.

To counter that threat, the United States has expanded land- and sea-based missile defense systems in and around the Gulf. Petraeus said this "regional security architecture" included a network of shared early warning systems and ballistic missile defenses.

Some lawmakers point to signs that the Obama administration is moving to a containment strategy, rather than one aimed at denying Iran a nuclear weapon.

Petraeus declined to comment on what he termed a "big policy hypothetical."

He said current U.S. policy was "very clear" in that "the president has said that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons."

(Reporting by Adam Entous and Phil Stewart; editing by Mohammad Zargham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
gangof4 wrote:
In spite of the repeated calls for (utterly useless) sanctions it seems like the U.S. is in a state of denial over Iranian intentions. We first saw this during the Bush administrations a the intelligence reports and now there are further rumors contrary to what even the IAEA accepts as a real possibility. We’ve heard the “if we build it they will come” saying. Today in regard to Iranian nuclear weapons intentions the philosophy seems to be “if we deny it they will stop.”

Mar 16, 2010 1:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
EstherHaman wrote:
IF IRAN HAD ANY INTENTION OF BUILDING A NUCLEAR BOMB THEY WOULD NOT HAVE SLOWED DOWN THE LEU PRODUCTION, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE GONE TO THE 5+1 MEETINGS TO NEGOTIATE.

SO, ENOUGH WAR MONGERING AND FEAR MONGERING. THESE TACTICS BY THE ZIONISTS DID NOT WORK AND NOW THEY ARE CAUGHT IN THEIR OWN LIES WITH THE SETTLEMENTS IN THE EAST JERUSALEM THAT THEY ARE NOT ABLE TO EXPLAIN TO THE WORLD AS WHY THEY BUILT?! ONE THING IS CLEAR AND THAT IS THEY WILL NOT GO TO THE PEACE TABLE WITH THE PALESTINIANS AND THAT WAS THEIR ORIGINAL INTENTION WITH ALL THIS PROPAGANDA.

NOW IRAN IS NOT BUILDING A-BOMBS, SO WHAT IS THEIR EXCUSE!?

Mar 16, 2010 1:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.