U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

FCC backs plan to speed up Internet

Related Topics

An Afghan man uses the Internet at the Lincoln U.S. support library in Herat December 13, 2009. REUTERS/Morteza Nikoubazl

An Afghan man uses the Internet at the Lincoln U.S. support library in Herat December 13, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Morteza Nikoubazl

WASHINGTON | Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:47pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Communications regulators submitted to Congress a national broadband plan that aims to expand access, increase Internet speeds and shift airwaves to mobile services.

The five members of the Federal Communications Commission unanimously approved on Tuesday a summary of the plan that will need action by Congress, the commission and the communications industry to become reality.

Its recommendations include boosting Internet speeds by up to 25 times the current average, freeing 500 megahertz of airwaves for mobile broadband services over the next decade and pouring billions of dollars into subsidized service for the poor and rural areas.

The Senate Commerce Committee has scheduled a March 23 hearing on the proposals. A panel of the House Energy and Commerce Committee is due to examine the plan on March 25.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski is expected to testify at both hearings.

Details of the plan were released on Monday. It comes as the Internet increasingly delivers everything from telephone service to movies, music and banking services.

FCC officials have repeatedly said that the United States lags countries in Europe and Asia in terms of adoption rates and Internet speed.

The plan aims to have 100 million American households get Internet speeds of 100 megabits per second (Mbps) by 2020 -- a speed that would allow a consumer to download a two-hour, high-definition movie in less than 10 minutes.

Congress requested the report as part of the economic stimulus bill enacted in February of 2009.

The plan also proposes that broadcasters like CBS Corp give up some of their airwaves for auction to wireless broadband providers, with broadcasters getting some of the proceeds. The FCC wants additional authority from Congress to conduct those auctions.

"I think we'll seem them (the FCC) move quickly," on the details of the spectrum reallocation plans, said Chris Guttman-McCabe, vice president of regulatory affairs at the CTIA wireless trade group.

CTIA represents AT&T Inc; Verizon Wireless, a venture of Verizon Communications Inc and Vodafone Group Plc; Sprint Nextel Corp and Deutsche Telekom AG's T-Mobile USA unit.

FCC officials declined to say which of the recommendations they will tackle first. The FCC is scheduled to hold its next open meeting April 22.

"Today marks the beginning of a long process, not the end of one," FCC member Robert McDowell told Tuesday's meeting.

Public interest groups largely voiced support for the plan but urged the FCC to focus on fostering competition to drive down prices and drive up speeds.

"This will require confronting the market power of the cable and telephone giants that control the broadband market," Free Press Executive Director Josh Silver said in a statement.

"The problems caused by the lack of competition are what led the Congress to order up a National Broadband Plan," said Silver.

(Reporting by John Poirier; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (13)
HeatherGirl wrote:
The problem will be if the goverement owns any portion of the internet wiring we all know what this will mean; they will tax it.

This means, as usual, that some people get to pay for the services of the rest of the people!!

At what point do we say that people actually can have what they can pay for? How much of someone else’s needs is everyone else responsible for?

Mar 15, 2010 9:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
nukified wrote:
mind u that we already have taxes on internet and such.. just like most other commodities…

but nonetheless.. sounds like this plan would be something great! i would love to have somewhere around 100 mbps! it sucks trying to do anything on internet that is super slow…

and they are shifting funds from the USF (which is dead weight right now) to something useful… broadband support.

Mar 15, 2010 9:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Bisky71 wrote:
The internet is fast enough for me for streaming and otherwise and I personally see no need for anything. If it improves great, as long as there is no iota of government encroachment whatsoever. NONE.
NO regulation of content. NO ability to shut anything down for security or anything else, NO additional taxes, NO FCC regulation, NOTHING! I fear they are going to go strongly in the direction of calling wireless internet “broadcasting” and try to control the airwaves like they do with TV

Mar 15, 2010 10:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.