Senator asks drugmakers to explain prices

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:54pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Senate Democrat asked top drugmakers on Wednesday to explain why Americans pay higher prices for prescription drugs than patients do in other developed nations.

Senator Herb Kohl, who chairs the Special Committee on Aging, sent letters to AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis.

Kohl said Americans on average pay twice as much as people in other industrialized countries.

"While I firmly believe that drug quality should not be sacrificed for cost, the large discrepancies in the cost of identical drugs cannot be explained by differences in production or manufacturing," Kohl wrote to the companies.

Some Democrats have attacked drugmakers as the U.S. Congress works on an overhaul of U.S. healthcare system.

The pharmaceutical industry has pledged to pay $80 billion over 10 years in price cuts and other concessions to help fund wider insurance coverage as part of a healthcare overhaul under consideration in Congress.

Some lawmakers have criticized that amount as a small price to pay for a $315 billion-a-year industry that stands to gain tens of millions of new customers if insurance coverage expands. Democrats are trying to pass a final bill for President Barack Obama to sign into law in the coming weeks.

Eli Lilly, responding to Kohl's letter, said drug prices were lower in other countries for various reasons including currency value, market dynamics or government price controls.

The United States "relies on competition rather than government-imposed price controls that contain costs" and U.S. patients "have the greatest access to the newest medicines," Lilly spokesman Ed Sagebiel said.

Pfizer spokeswoman Kristen Neese said the company "stands behind the value our innovative medicines bring to patients." The company provides free or discounted medicines to uninsured other needy patients, she said.

Novartis is reviewing the senator's request and will respond to the committee, a company spokeswoman said.

GlaxoSmithKline spokeswoman Mary Anne Rhyne said the company had no comment.

Officials at other companies had no immediate comment or could not immediately be reached.

(Reporting by Lisa Richwine; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn and Steve Orlofsky)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
moebadderman wrote:
Big Pharma pricing is based upon the precedent established by the railroads in the Nineteenth Century: “what the traffic will bear”.

Mar 17, 2010 8:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Born2Late wrote:
Jeeze….Talk about a rhetorical question :-D!! Why? Because they’re greedy, corrupt thieves! That’s why. Only a complete moron would ask such a question. Big Pharm is an evil industry. I’ve been in nursing for over fifteen years. Believe what I say.

Mar 17, 2010 8:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Why do they have to explain anything to the government? Government wants them to “show them their papers”? This will be every company making a profit, and then every citizen with an above average income, and eventually, the government will be the great decider on prices, wages, job, living quarters, and even the town you are assigned.

Buck them, big pharma. Buck them Ford and Toyota, don’t cooperate, assert your God-given rights, assert your Constitutional rights, help slow the authoritarian dictatorship police state this administration is forming.

Mar 18, 2010 8:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.