Factbox: Details of final healthcare bill

Related Video

Video

Health care by the numbers

Thu, Mar 18 2010

Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:00pm EDT

(Reuters) - Congressional Democrats have unveiled the final changes to a sweeping healthcare overhaul they hope will clear the House of Representatives on Sunday.

Democrats are using a two-step process that involves the House approving the Senate-passed version of the bill and passing the proposed final changes. The Senate must act on the changes before President Barack Obama can sign them into law. Here are key provisions of the legislation including the proposed changes.

INSURANCE MARKET REFORM

The legislation would require substantial insurance market reforms that would bar insurers from excluding people for pre-existing conditions and prevent them from arbitrarily dropping policy holders.

Insurance exchanges would be created where small businesses and individuals without employer-sponsored coverage would be able to shop for coverage. Plans offered on the exchange would have to meet minimum benefit requirements.

The proposed changes would allow dependent children to remain on their parents' health policies until age 26.

The Senate bill requires insurers to spend at least 85 cents of every premium dollar on medical care in small group markets and 80 cents in large group markets. The proposed changes also would require Medicare Advantage insurers to spend at least 85 percent of revenues on medical care.

COVERAGE MANDATES, SUBSIDIES AND MEDICAID

Individuals would be required to obtain health insurance. Those who fail to purchase coverage would face fines of up to 2.5 percent of income by 2016.

Firms with more than 50 workers who do not offer medical coverage could face fines of $2,000 per full-time employee.

Federal subsidies would be provided to help people with incomes up to 400 percent of the poverty level purchase coverage on the exchange. Proposed changes would sweeten those subsidies for lower income people.

Medicaid, the government healthcare program for the poor, would be available to everyone with incomes up to 133 percent of the poverty level, which stood at $10,830 for an individual and $22,050, for a family of four. Many states have eligibility requirements below those levels.

The proposed changes would get rid of a special deal to help Nebraska pay for the expanded coverage and boost aid to all states.

FINANCING

The final proposal makes some adjustments to the revenue measures in the Senate-passed bill.

The Senate bill included a 40 percent excise tax on high-cost health insurance plans. The proposed changes would delay implementation of the tax until 2018 instead of 2013. The tax would kick in on plans costing $10,200 for individuals and $27,500 for family coverage. A higher threshold is allowed for plans covering mostly women, older workers and retirees as well as those in high-risk professions.

The bill calls for raising the payroll taxes for Medicare, the government health insurance plan for the elderly, to 2.35 percent from the current 1.45 percent for individuals earning $200,000 or more and for couples earning $250,000 or more. The proposed changes would apply the tax to some investment income as well for those high-income groups.

The bill would impose fees on medical device manufacturers, insurance providers and brand name pharmaceuticals. The proposed changes would delay implementation of those fees.

MEDICARE

The legislation would freeze payments to insurers that provide coverage to Medicare patients in 2011 and begin reducing the subsidy in 2012.

It would also gradually close the gap in drug coverage for Medicare beneficiaries by 2020. Those who enter the coverage gap, the so-called doughnut hole, in 2010 will get a $250 rebate. In 2011 they would get a 50 percent discount on brand-name drugs.

(Reporting by Donna Smith; Editing by Eric Beech)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (36)
wrote:
Finally!!! About time…

And for all you big govt. Tea Party whatevers… Isnt it government’s responsibility to pick up where the system is failing? Well, newsflash, health care in America has been failing its citizens. First time in my lifetime I’ve seen our government do something for its citizens and I am quite proud. Just need it to pass now…

If anything is truly needed to be fixed in order to save our balance sheet its SS reform, not healthcare.

Mar 18, 2010 12:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
hankster6 wrote:
It’s amazing to me that the trio, Obama, Pelosi, and Reid, are attempting to throw the constitution out the window. 36 states, so far, are ready to take the law, if passed, to court, to get it overthrown on constitutional grounds. This shows me the disrespect/distain that these irrational thinkers have for our constitution! The best and only constitution of it’s kind in the world and these irrational thinkers want to ignore it because they believe they are smarter than our founding fathers! They are not only not smarter, they are downright foolish!! Hurry up NOVEMBER ELECTIONS!! Goodbye dems, hopefully! In no way do I want to be scared out of my wits for 3 more years!

Mar 19, 2010 8:35am EDT  --  Report as abuse
miller4x4 wrote:
NO, it is not the responsibility of the government to pick up where the “system” leaves off.

This is one of the fundamental problems with our modern government.

To govern is not the same as to maintain social programs. The entire concept of taking from everyone to make up shortages for some is degrading to the drive to better oneself. If every notch up the ladder I get, a bigger piece of my accomplishments goes to someone else, then what is my incentive to better myself.

You want socialism, go someplace that wasn’t founded on capitalism and reaping rewards equal to the effort that YOU put in.

NEWSFLASH: The american dream was always about making a better life for you and your family, not receiving a better life just by showing up.

Mar 19, 2010 8:40am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.