Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Cat-calling men give all men a bad name?

Related Topics

A woman casts a shadow as she walks on a street in Tokyo August 3, 2009. REUTERS/Stringer

A woman casts a shadow as she walks on a street in Tokyo August 3, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Stringer

NEW YORK | Fri Mar 19, 2010 12:03pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Men who harass women with cat calls and sexual comments are actually harming their whole gender, a study has found.

The research, by Stephenie Chaudoir and Diane Quinn of the University of Connecticut in the United States, looked into the feelings and reactions of women who saw and heard men making derogatory remarks to other women.

The researchers asked 114 undergraduate female students to watch a video and imagine themselves as bystanders to a situation where a man made either a sexist remark at another woman or simply greeted her.

The students were then asked to rate their levels of anxiety and depression as well as their anger and fear toward men and their desire to move against or away from men.

The study showed that in addition to feeling upset, women were more likely to take the sexist remark as an insult to their gender, and feel greater anger and motivation to take direct action toward men in general.

"Women are obviously implicated because they suffer direct negative consequences as targets of prejudice and, as the current work demonstrates, indirect consequences as bystanders," the researchers said in the study.

"But sexism also harms men as well. Whenever a single man's prejudiced actions are attributed to his gender identity, male perpetrators impact how women view and react to men generally."

The study was published in the journal Sex Roles.

(Writing by Miral Fahmy, editing by Jeremy Laurence)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
terptek wrote:
why is thispart of oddly enough when it should be part of “Readily Obvious.” Big News – please go report how politicians have a propensity to fooling around with 20 year olds within a two mile radius…

Mar 19, 2010 2:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
jwahlgren wrote:
Is it not the definition of prejudice to attribute the actions of a single member of a group to all the members of a group?

Mar 19, 2010 3:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Kleinzeit wrote:
I am interested in the language being used here. The researchers refer to “a single man’s prejudiced actions [being] attributed to his gender identity”… There is a name for this. The name is “sexism.” This is the very definition of sexism; but it isn’t being called that. Why? Because the word “sexism” is being reserved to describe what men do to women. The idea that women can in fact (as this study shows) also be sexist is glossed over; if women are sometimes unfair to men, it suggests, then this is still the fault of men.
Perhaps the tide is turning; the possibility of sexism on the part of women is at least beginning to be hinted at. Unfortunately, we still seem to be stuck in this antiquated view that one group must be the victim and the other group must be the aggressor and that it is completely impossible for both groups to be being unfair to each other at the same time.

Mar 19, 2010 4:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.