U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Q+A: What does healthcare reform mean for Obama?

WASHINGTON | Sat Mar 20, 2010 9:49am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama and his fellow Democrats are rallying congressional Democrats to support his effort to revamp the $2.5 trillion U.S. healthcare industry before a critical vote in the House of Representatives on Sunday.

Here are some questions and answers about what the battle to pass healthcare legislation means to the Democratic president:

WILL FAILURE CRIPPLE OBAMA'S PRESIDENCY?

Congressional Democrats seem to think so.

Some House Democrats who had not planned to back the revamp have been swayed by concern that its failure -- after more than a year of intense effort -- could leave Obama unable to push through any major legislation.

With Republicans nearly unanimous in their opposition to Obama's major initiatives, they argue, Democratic divisions could irretrievably weaken him even though, for now, his party holds the majority of seats in both the House and Senate.

"We have to be very careful that the potential of President Obama's presidency not be destroyed by this debate," said Dennis Kucinich, a liberal congressman who had opposed the legislation, said at a news conference announcing his support.

"The Obama presidency will be crippled if this bill doesn't pass," said William Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, an adviser to President Bill Clinton during his failed fight for healthcare reform in 1994, which led to the loss of the Democratic majority in Congress.

"I was there in the fall of 1994, and it wasn't pretty."

WILL OBAMA'S PLAN "BEND THE CURVE" AND KEEP HEALTHCARE

COSTS FROM DESTROYING THE U.S. ECONOMY?

The $2.5 trillion U.S. healthcare industry accounts for one-sixth of the country's gross domestic product, and a centerpiece of Obama's argument for his overhaul has been that rising costs must be controlled because they risk destroying the economy.

Republicans contend that Obama's plan is too broad and too expensive, and will increase the already high federal budget deficit. They want the healthcare reform effort scrapped and to start over, taking a more incremental approach.

The Democrats' case for the broad overhaul was boosted on Thursday when the Congressional Budget Office estimated that it would cost $940 billion over 10 years, but cut the deficit by $138 billion over the same period.

Many economists say the plan is at least an important step in the right direction toward controlling costs.

"I do think we have a credible shot at bending the curve," said Len Nichols, a healthcare economist at George Mason University in Virginia.

"(Healthcare is) the single biggest fiscal contributor to our structural imbalance. I don't know how to fix that without getting Medicare's delivery system better aligned with incentives. I don't know how to do that without systemwide health reform," he said.

"If there were a simpler, step-by-step incremental way, we would have ... written it down by now."

IF IT PASSES, WILL HEALTHCARE HELP OBAMA'S DEMOCRATS KEEP

THEIR MAJORITIES IN CONGRESS?

If the overhaul passes, its influence on the election will depend on whether it works and how quickly voters start to feel an impact.

If Obama can get a bill through Congress in the next few weeks, and Americans feel they are benefiting from its provisions by November, it will be hard for Republicans to convince the public not to embrace the legislation.

If voters do not feel the benefits by November, the Democrats will have a harder time, especially if joblessness still hovers near 10 percent.

"In the end, what will be remembered is whether the bill produces what it's promising," said David Kendall, senior fellow for health and fiscal policy at the centrist Third Way think tank.

IF IT FAILS, WILL HEALTHCARE COST THE DEMOCRATS THEIR

MAJORITIES IN CONGRESS?

The party that holds the White House typically loses seats in Congress in the first election after a new president takes office.

The Democrats lost their majorities in Congress in 1994, after Clinton tried and failed to reform healthcare, amid Democratic divisions and high voter turnout.

Failure this year would likely hurt them again. After a year of political squabbling about healthcare, voters will be angry at both parties, but Democrats will be hurt more.

"If it doesn't pass, then I think the scenario from '94 has a more likely impact because voters will be disappointed that, after all the fighting and everything they put up with for the last year, they don't see results," Kendall said.

Democrats -- and Obama -- will also be hurt because they had the majority, made the effort, and failed to win.

"If you can't lead, you look weak, and Americans don't like weakness," Kendall said.

(Editing by David Alexander and Chris Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
IdiotSavant wrote:
Congressman Schrader,
As a resident of Oregon and a U.S. citizen concerned for the future of our state and country I strongly urge you to vote against the healthcare reform proposal. I cannot remember a time when there has been proposed legislation that has irked me as badly as this healthcare reform has. To think that this country would even consider legislation that would force its citizens to take on personal debt of this magnitude whether we want it or not is unprecedented to say the least.
Believe me when I say that I am not comforted simply because this legislation claims that there will be subsidies for those of us who cannot afford the full price of the health policies for it will still require me to use up the small and precious resources I do have in order to pay for something I do not want.
It is for this reason I urge you to vote NO on healthcare reform. There is other ways to reform healthcare without forcing us to take on a debt that will cause low income people–already struggling with the burden of just trying to survive–to take on added debt–again I say even subsidies will not cover the full cost of that added burden.
Please do not allow this legislation to become law.

Mar 20, 2010 7:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
BTUBill wrote:
You’ve got to wonder about a $1 trillion dollar Health Care bill that collects extra taxes for four years before the main provisions even kick in.

They couldn’t start the full impact right away because that would double the cost.

Obama hopes that he will be comfortably in his second term four years from now when people finally realize just how expensive this Health Care bill really is.

The rest of the Democrats are just as unassertive (dishonest, cowardly – servile?) by passing this bill by not even passing this bill by a straight vote, but by voting on ANOTHER bill that itself passes the Health Care bill. That’s unconscionable.

Personally, I think Obama should have had a thorough psych evaluation when he had his annual check up a while back…

OBAMA: I’m the greatest. Me! Only me.

DR: With all due respect sir, Mohammed Ali was the greatest. You are only a Hussein.

OBAMA: I have a dream, of being the most beloved President in the history of the whole entire Republic.

DR: Apologies, Mr. President, but “the dream” was and always will belong to the Rev. Martin Luther King. Personally, my doctor friends and I categorize your dream as more of a congenital nightmare.

OBAMA: My genius will reduce the federal deficit by T-T-T– trillions! Me – only me. Glory be in the highest.

DR: Now there’s a bona fide delusion if I ever saw one. Medicare is already under funded by $38 trillion over the next 20 years – and you have the unmitigated gall to think adding 13 million to Medicaid will help that?

OBAMA: The Congressional Budget Office… they shine my halo every time!

DR: Those looney-tunes? They’re all on psychoactive meds. Here, let me write you a prescription too – you’re a basket case if there ever was one.

Mar 20, 2010 10:51am EDT  --  Report as abuse
JJWest wrote:
$2.5 TRILLION. The amount is incomprehensible. In the hands of BIG government, BIG bureaucracies and BIG government unions though you can be guaranteed health care will double to $5 Trillion within a decade. If you think our economy is bankrupt now, you have seen nothing yet!

Mar 20, 2010 4:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.