Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

U.S. holds firm against Israel settlement policy

Related Topics

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in his office in Jerusalem, March 21, 2010. REUTERS/Uriel Sinai/Pool

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in his office in Jerusalem, March 21, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Uriel Sinai/Pool

WASHINGTON | Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:54pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Monday Israel's policy of expanding Jewish settlements endangered the peace process as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrived seeking a way forward on talks with the Palestinians.

There were few signs that tensions in U.S. relations with its key Mideast ally, which have surged in recent weeks amid a spat over settlement policy, were over.

Netanyahu was due to meet President Barack Obama, Clinton and other top U.S. officials on the three-day trip, but the meetings were kept low-key with almost no media access.

The United States and Israel have clashed since Netanyahu's government this month announced a new expansion of a Jewish settlement in East Jerusalem, embarrassing visiting U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and prompting Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to threaten to pull out of indirect peace talks that had only just been launched.

Clinton called the announcement "insulting" and demanded that Netanyahu outline specific steps to restore confidence in the peace process -- something both sides say he has now done, although neither side has released specifics.

Clinton, in a speech to the influential pro-Israel AIPAC lobby in Washington on Monday, said Israel faced "difficult but necessary choices" on Mideast peace and called Israel's settlement policy a problem.

"New construction in East Jerusalem or the West Bank undermines mutual trust and endangers the proximity talks that are the first step toward the full negotiations that both sides want and need," Clinton said.

"It exposes daylight between Israel and the United States that others in the region could hope to exploit. And it undermines America's unique ability to play a role -- an essential role, I might add -- in the peace process."

EMOTIVE ISSUES

Netanyahu, before leaving for Washington, appeared to hold firm to the settlement strategy and his spokesman said he would stress that Jerusalem -- which Israel regards as its capital -- was "not a settlement."

The Obama administration's firm line on Israel drew fire from senior Republican members of the House of Representatives, highlighting what could become an emotive issue in this year's U.S. congressional elections.

"Now is not the time to be picking fights with Israel in what seems to be an attempt to curry favor with the Arab world," Eric Cantor, the No. 2 House Republican, said in a speech to AIPAC.

U.S. officials said a Monday meeting between Clinton and Netanyahu had been changed from State Department headquarters to Netanyahu's hotel, and U.S. reporters would not have access to a joint photo opportunity.

Asked if the change reflected continued tensions between the two sides, State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said the switch was made at Israel's request.

"I don't know the reason for the shift but that is something that is an Israeli prerogative," Crowley said. "I wouldn't read anything into the change in venue nor into the change in media coverage."

Netanyahu's meeting with Obama on Tuesday was likely to be similarly low-key, with no public statements expected. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs's list of goals for the meeting was modest.

"The president is hopeful that we will in this meeting make progress and get -- without getting into the intricacies of it -- get these two parties not just back physically to talks but to the type of relationship that is necessary for those talks to bear fruit," he said.

The low-profile White House meeting may at least avoid further irking Palestinians at a time when Obama is trying to persuade them to return to indirect talks despite the Israeli leader's position on settlement expansion.

DEFIANT ON SETTLEMENTS

Before his departure for Washington, Netanyahu appeared defiant on settlements, saying Israel would not stop Jewish settlement construction in areas around East Jerusalem captured by Israel in 1967.

Citing biblical and historical links, Israel sees all of Jerusalem as its capital, a claim not recognized internationally. The Palestinians want East Jerusalem to be the capital of a future state on the West Bank and the Gaza strip.

Netanyahu will address the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) conference on Monday. His spokesman, Mark Regev, said the speech would focus on Iran, the peace process and U.S.-Israel relations, and would stress that Jerusalem is Israel's capital and "not a settlement."

Palestinian officials have continued to insist that Israel's decision to continue settlement building in and around East Jerusalem would prove fatal to the peace process.

Under U.S. and international pressure, Netanyahu announced a 10-month moratorium on new housing starts in Jewish settlements in November. But he excluded East Jerusalem and nearby annexed areas of the West Bank from the building freeze.

Clinton, who last year praised Netanyahu's moratorium announcement, said on Monday the United States still regarded continued Jewish settlements as illegitimate and urged both sides not to take steps to undermine the fragile peace effort.

U.S. envoy George Mitchell urged "a period of calm and quiet" after meeting Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the Jordanian capital Amman on Monday. The State Department said Mitchell later left en route for Washington.

(Additional reporting by Suleiman al-Khalidi in Amman and Matt Spetalnick in Washington, editing by Will Dunham and Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
Miltdog wrote:
Nah, don’t read anything into the change of venue. Just a matter of the pimp telling the “ho” how it is.

Mar 22, 2010 2:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PwlM wrote:
@Miltdog
and who is the pimp?

Mar 22, 2010 4:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
colindale wrote:
Dropping CLUSTER BOMBS and missiles on defenseless civilians, is not brave and takes no courage.
March 22, 2010

“Israel’s history is the story of brave men and women who took risks and did the hard thing because they knew it was right” HRC at AIPAC

The above is, without doubt, true. I knew not a few of them personally.

But it is also the story of cowardly men, particularly in the last quarter century, who took minimal risk but inflicted maximum damage and death on civilian populations who could not defend themselves. Dropping cluster bombs and missiles on defenseless civilians, is not brave and takes no courage.

It is also the story of widespread and endemic corruption that has permeated every strata of Israeli politics.

But Hillary Clinton could not refer to these inhuman actions, of various Israeli governments including those of Sharon and Olmert, that are the antithesis of democracy, because these are facts that AIPAC will not hear.

Let us all hope and pray that the Obama administration keeps its nerve and its courage and deals once and for all with this conflict and the atrocities that it authorizes and the hate that it engenders. And, not least, to the terrible damage that it does, by error of association, to Judaism.

Mar 22, 2010 5:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.