Clinton says Israel settlements obstacle to peace

WASHINGTON Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:02pm EDT

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee annual policy conference in Washington, March 22, 2010. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee annual policy conference in Washington, March 22, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Video

Related News

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Monday that Israel faces "difficult but necessary choices" on Mideast peace and pledged to push for biting sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program.

Clinton, speaking to the influential pro-Israel AIPAC lobby group after a turbulent stretch in U.S.-Israel relations, said the Obama administration had a "rock solid" commitment to Israel's peace and security.

But she singled out Israel's policy of expanding Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank as an obstacle to progress which could imperil U.S. efforts to bring Israel and the Palestinians back to the negotiating table.

"New construction in East Jerusalem or the West Bank undermines mutual trust and endangers the proximity talks that are the first step toward the full negotiations that both sides want and need," Clinton said.

"It exposes daylight between Israel and the United States that others in the region could hope to exploit. And it undermines America's unique ability to play a role -- an essential role, I might add -- in the peace process."

The issue of Jewish settlements has soured U.S. ties with its closest Mideast ally as Israel approved new construction in East Jerusalem during a visit by Vice President Joe Biden, spurring Palestinians to say they would pull out of the indirect talks that Washington only just managed to launch.

Clinton is due to meet visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later on Monday and U.S. Mideast peace envoy George Mitchell is in the region seeking to get the talks back on track.

Netanyahu, who arrived in Washington earlier on Monday, has proposed a set of confidence-building measures following the settlement fracas, but said on Sunday Israel would not give up its right to build Jewish settlements around Jerusalem.

Clinton stressed Washington's view that the status quo between Israel and the Palestinians was unsustainable, saying "the dynamics of demography, ideology, and technology" will eventually force political change.

It was also complicating a range of other U.S. policy goals in the region, including its efforts to muster a united front against Iran's nuclear program, she said.

"There is another path. A path that leads toward security and prosperity for all the people in the region. It will require all parties -- including Israel -- to make difficult but necessary choices," Clinton said.

PRESSURE ON SETTLEMENTS

She indicated that Washington would continue to press Israel to go slow on new settlement construction, repeating the U.S. view that continued Israeli settlements are illegitimate.

"As Israel's friend, it is our responsibility to give credit when it is due and to tell the truth when it is needed," Clinton said.

Clinton said the United States would continue to demand that Hamas, the Islamist Palestinian group that controls the Gaza Strip, renounce violence and recognize Israel. She also repeated U.S. calls for the release of captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, according to the speech excerpts.

And she said the United States would continue to press for direct negotiations that could lead to a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians, with U.S. Mideast peace envoy George Mitchell's efforts to start indirect "proximity" negotiations as an essential foundation.

"These proximity talks are a hopeful first step, and they should be serious and substantive. Ultimately, of course, it will take direct negotiations to work through all the issues and end the conflict," she said.

Clinton said Iran remained a major threat, both to Israel and the broader region, and said she saw a growing consensus that it was time to take tough new steps to pressure Tehran to give up its nuclear program.

Clinton said a nuclear-armed Iran "would embolden its terrorist clientele and could spark an arms race that could destabilize the region."

Clinton said the United States and its partners in the U.N. Security Council were determined to show Iran's leaders that there are consequences to intransigence over its nuclear program, which Tehran insists is purely for peaceful purposes.

"Our aim is not incremental sanctions, but sanctions that will bite," Clinton said, adding that it was taking time to reach agreement but that this was "a worthwhile investment for winning the broadest possible support for our efforts."

(Reporting by Andrew Quinn; Editing by Patricia Wilson and David Storey)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Aftab68 wrote:
Peace must be given a chance, specially when International Community is on the same page. Israel must show flexibility and respect to the concern of all who would love to see Peace in this part of the world. If efforts are derailed by any party in the region it would build more hatred by non state actors in and around the region, specially in the Muslim world. Being a Pakistani Christian I would request ALL to do something through give and take so that people in this region do their daily work without any fear of attack from the either side.

Mar 22, 2010 10:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
raccman1 wrote:
Just out of curiosity what with all the oil-rich arab countries out there – HOW MANY NEW HOMES HAVE BEEN BUILT IN ARAB so-called “Palestinean” Lands ? WHY NOT ?

Mar 22, 2010 10:29am EDT  --  Report as abuse
wjrood wrote:
Yes, the settlements are an obstacle to peace. Peace is in the stated interest of the US.

However, the truth is that the powers that control Israel do not want peace. They prefer expansion.

It would seem that US and Israeli interests are not congruent, but it’s not quite that simple. There are interests in the US — industries, the officer class, the punditry and Congressional pork — that are rewarded by instability and turmoil in the world. That’s a big reason we never stand up to Israeli leadership or AIPAC.

Mar 22, 2010 10:30am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.