UPDATE 2-Geithner opens debate on U.S. housing finance

Tue Mar 23, 2010 4:50pm EDT

* Housing debate starting, changes likely to take years

* Geithner sees some role for government in housing

* Republicans want to scrap Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac (Recasts; adds background)

By Corbett B. Daly

WASHINGTON, March 23 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on Tuesday launched what could be a years-long process of overhauling the government's role in helping Americans buy homes, a first step toward rebuilding the housing finance system at the heart of the financial crisis.

Geithner told lawmakers the government should continue to play some role in any new system of housing finance Congress develops, although he said mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae FNM.N and Freddie Mac FRE.N should not be nationalized.

The two firms, which own or guarantee more than half of all U.S. residential mortgages, were seized by the government in late 2008 as mortgage losses mounted. Fannie and Freddie, which were chartered by Congress to promote homeownership but operated as private, shareholder companies, have been central to the Obama administration's efforts to revive the battered housing market.

"I think there is a quite strong economic case, quite a strong public policy case, for preserving, designing some form of guarantee for the government to help facilitate a stable housing finance market," Geithner told the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee.

Geithner said the central role the housing sector plays in the U.S. economy and its vulnerability to financial shocks justified a degree of government backing.

"I think we will be likely to conclude, as our predecessors have, that there will be some role for a guarantee of some weight," he said.

Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's quasi-public status allowed them access to cheap capital, which helped boost their profits. They ran into trouble when home prices -- and the complicated securities tied to them -- began to tumble.

The government has so far injected more than $125 billion into the two companies and the support is expected to continue. Some analysts expect taxpayers to pump as much as $200 billion into the companies by the end of the year as losses continue.

The Obama administration has pledged unlimited support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac through 2012, no matter how high their losses go.

Geithner said a new system of housing finance needs to be found for the long term.

Many Republican lawmakers want to phase out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and replace them with a housing finance market where private capital is the primary source of funding. See [ID:nN19159086].

The Obama administration has been reluctant to put forth a proposal on the future of the two firms. Representative Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, called the hearing with Geithner to jump-start debate on the issue.

"We have two jobs here today. One is to figure out the best way to wind down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But an equally important job is to decide what goes in their place," the Massachusetts Democrat said. "You can't really tear down the old jail until you've built the new one."

Geithner provided only a vague outline of how the administration wants to proceed. Last month, he said any specific proposal would not come until 2011 at the earliest.

Representative Spencer Bachus, the panel's top Republican, called the lack of action creating a new system "unacceptable."

"Without reform, the bailouts will not stop, the housing market will not find its footing and the American economy will not recover," Bachus told Geithner.

The Treasury chief said any effort to overhaul the housing finance system should ensure that mortgage credit is widely available and should promote affordable housing, consumer protection and financial stability.

Any new system aiming to achieve those goals should have a diversified investor base, accurate and transparent pricing, secondary market liquidity and clearly defined goals and objectives, he said.

"I suspect we are going to find very strong support for reform," Geithner said. "The challenge is going to be just to design something that we think is going to work better in the future." (Editing by Kenneth Barry and Leslie Adler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
ruhr wrote:
Seems to me three things are needed.

One is a source of funds to drive Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac operations.

How about retires are allowed to deposit funds with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and earn tax exempt income of up to $40k pa.

Secondly is regulation that works for all participants in the housing market. This may include the following:-

• The mortgagee to maintain an active savings account for a period of not less than one year before an application for housing finance may be processed. This requirement needs to be checked and confirmed as well as the fact the applicant is in full time employment.

• The mortgagee is required to hold a deposit equal to not less than 15% of the purchase price of the property.

• Consideration should be given to placing limits on the amount loaned based on the annual income, exclusive of overtime, earned by the mortgage applicant. The recommendation is a limit of 3.75 times income of $50k pa rising to 4 times income up to $100k pa inclusive of the 15% deposit.

Finally, is it possible to provide long term low cost funding of 4.5% pa to mortgage applicants and make the dream of home ownership a reality? This can be achieved where mortgage applicants agree to accept a low interest rate of 2% on savings in exchange for a fixed term 25 to 30 year mortgage. The driver for this is the increase in retained income accruing to the mortgagee; this may be combined with a lowering of the tax rate applied to the mortgage provider.

Mar 23, 2010 4:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.