Turkey rebuffs U.S. call to join Iran sanctions

ANKARA | Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:11am EDT

ANKARA (Reuters) - NATO-member Turkey on Wednesday rebuffed calls from ally the United States to support more sanctions against Iran over Tehran's nuclear program, saying diplomacy should be given more chance.

Turkey, a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has been leery of a U.S.-led push to back new sanctions on fellow Muslim nation Iran, which the West suspects is trying to develop atomic bombs.

"There is still an opportunity ahead of us and we believe that this opportunity should be used effectively. Not less, but more diplomacy (is needed)," Turkey's Foreign Ministry spokesman Burak Ozugergin told a news conference.

Last week, Assistant Secretary of State Philip Gordon, the U.S. State Department's top diplomat for Europe, urged Turkey to support more sanctions against Iran, saying Ankara could face consequences if it moves out of step with the international community.

Turkey, which has applied to join the European Union, is not the only country that insists on more diplomacy with Iran, which says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

China, a permanent, veto-wielding member of the Security Council, along with non-permanent member Brazil, have urged more time for diplomacy with Iran.

Turkey has boosted ties with Iran and other Muslim neighbors since the Islamist-leaning AK Party first took office in 2002, and some commentators have expressed concern Ankara might be tilting away from its long-time Western allies.

Turkey has offered to use its access to the Iranian leadership to solve the nuclear dispute but frequent trips by Turkish officials to Tehran have failed to produce a breakthrough.

"We think that Iran has good intentions on this issue and wants a solution. Otherwise, we would not be making such efforts. We inform our Western friends regularly about the impressions we get (from talks with Iran)," Ozugergin said.

He reiterated Ankara's opposition to any Middle Eastern country acquiring nuclear weapons and said Iran had the right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes like all other countries.

(Editing by Janet Lawrence)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
DC106 wrote:
The hypocritical non-proliferation regime has become a politically driven tool in the hands of the United States to selectively “lay down the law” on weaker states. Why the fuss over Iran when Israel remains in a state of nuclear denial? And why does a member of the NPT like Iran get punished for seeking civilian enrichment technology, when India and its nuclear arsenal has chosen to remain outside the regime and challenge it overtly, gets a big reward from Washington instead? Furthermore, why expect compliance with Western preferences in the NPT if the major nuclear powers have been unable to honor their part of the deal and move decisively toward disarmament?

Mar 24, 2010 9:58am EDT  --  Report as abuse
lipservice wrote:
U.S. labels Armenian deaths ‘genocide’
US’S PRO ISRAEL ACCUSATIONS OR SUSPICIONS AGAINST ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN TO BUILD NUCLEAR WEAPONS ARE ONLY ANTI ISLAM BASELESS ZIONIST hypothetically SPECULATIVE PROPAGANDA WITH NO PROOF WHATSOEVER, WHILE ISRAEL BUILDING NUKES TACITLY

Mar 24, 2010 11:08am EDT  --  Report as abuse
EstherHaman wrote:
When it is so clear to the whole world that it is us and the rest of our cronies, such Britain, France who are not even able to stand up to their own Zionists creation, what clout do we have? When they see that we are protecting the Zionists and their illegal actions, expanding into the East Jerusalem, blatantly breaking the international laws and Committing state sponsor of terrorism, Ethnic Cleansing with no reprisals, then what can we expect from them? For them to implicate themselves in these illegal action as we have by participating in this shenanigans? To go against any legitimately established international protocol and laws just to appease the Zionist once again?

We as a nation have failed to use logic and reasoning in many occasions. It seems unless we endanger our nation and spiel more blood and spend more or our treasure to the point of catastrophe with no legitimacy we can’t appease a minority of people in our country or in the world!!

This country will not and should not relinquish its principles and her future again and again just to appease the Zionists of this world at the expense of the rest.

Mar 25, 2010 11:02am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.