The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Home loan modification program oversold: watchdog

A view of a home for sale in Los Angeles February 24, 2010. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni )

A view of a home for sale in Los Angeles February 24, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Mario Anzuoni )

WASHINGTON | Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:03am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. program aimed at helping struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure has been oversold by the Treasury Department and is likely to be a failure when it wraps up in 2012, a report from the watchdog overseeing the $700 billion bank bailout said on Tuesday.

Even if the loan modification program ends up with 1.5 million to 2 million homeowners with new, more-favorable terms on their loans, "the program will not be a long-term success if large amounts of borrowers simply re-default and end up facing foreclosure anyway," the report said.

Neil Barofsky, the Treasury's Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, said the Obama administration's $75 billion Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) has a definition of success that is "essentially meaningless."

Barofsky noted that when HAMP was launched in the first few months of 2009, Treasury proclaimed the program would help up to 3 million to 4 million at-risk homeowners avoid foreclosure.

More recently, the Treasury has said the 3 million to 4 million figure refers to how many homeowners would receive offers of a trial modification, not how many homeowners get an actual long-term modification.

"To be meaningful, Treasury's goal for HAMP must relate to how many people are helped to avoid foreclosure; because offers standing alone do not actually assist homeowners, it is simply not a useful measure," Barofsky wrote.

DELAYING FORECLOSURES?

In its latest monthly report, Treasury said there were 1,003,902 active loan modifications through February and 168,708 of those have been made permanent. That was up from 946,735 active loan modifications and 116,297 permanent loan modifications through January.

But just 2.8 percent of the 6 million borrowers with loans delinquent more than 60 days have had their loan modifications made permanent through February.

And the number of homeowners with loans delinquent more than 60 days is rising far faster than the number of loans being made permanent each month.

As of January, there were 5.6 million homeowners who were 60 days or more behind on their payments. That means about 400,000 more people fell behind on their payments from January to February, compared to about 50,000 who received a permanent modification in that same period.

Approximately 2.8 million homeowners received foreclosure filings just in 2009, and millions more are expected in 2010, with some estimates predicting that the number will eclipse the already staggering 2009 number, the report said.

Barofsky urged Treasury to develop other performance metrics to measure over time the implementation and success of HAMP.

He suggested Treasury could set goals for mortgage servicers to achieve a certain percentage of modifications relative to the number of loans in default or measure the number of loan modifications relative to overall foreclosures.

"If HAMP ends up being a foreclosure mitigation program that merely delays foreclosures rather than preventing them, the program will be of questionable value, particularly in light of the huge investment of taxpayer funds," Barofsky wrote.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
oddjob wrote:
The real problem is underwater mortgages.
I paid $195,000 for my RI house in 2005. 10% down 5.2 fixed.
Now, it’s worth 105,000 and dropping, and I still owe $170,000.

I know, boohoo to me, but I saved for 3 years for that $20,000 down payment and now it’s so far underwater that sunlight won’t even reach.

Now if I get foreclosed, they’ll sell it to someone for $80k, while I’m kicked to the curb with messed up credit.
Sell it to me, I’ll pay $115,000. No can do, say the banks.
Well no can do from me either.
Here the keys.
Bye!!!

I know, boohoo to me. I should just suck it up and pay my motgage down and maybe in 20 years, the principal will be down to market value.

Mar 23, 2010 12:10am EDT  --  Report as abuse
reale wrote:
The reason for the failure is because Banks are not performing. They hire help that doesn’t know what they are doing. They ask for the same paperwork for a year straight instead of making the modification within a 4 month period. The other reason is because they only seem to modify these loans by 100-300 drop in payment, mostly 200.00 a month. This is my experience with banks. Others, they just do not give modifications.
Think,if the Bank get’s the seller to do a short sale, the bank will still lose money because most times the property eiher get’s destroyed or the buyer backs out, and when someone purchases down the road, it is for less money. Instead of lowering the amount of the loan for the previous owner and lowering the monthly payment, so they can afford to stay there and pay the new mortgage.
That might be to easy for banks to do, Banks, who would rather you lose the property and have it sit there until it sells for a lower price.
There has to be a benefit to the bank for acting in this crazy manner. They took our money and now they don’t want to do what is right.
Banks need to start performing, no more excuses. Modifications can be made, just let the bank finalize them in 4 months, not 1-2 years. Their actions are purposful.
For every loan that is not modified (in 4 months) the bank should pay a 5,000 penalty to the goverment in taxes (no write-off’s, no more excuses)

Mar 23, 2010 12:44am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Swarm wrote:
“Making Home Affordable” = Yet another “feel good” Obama boondoggle that does not really help people.

Mar 24, 2010 5:47am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.