Key lawmaker backs FCC's spectrum plan

WASHINGTON Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:41pm EDT

Related Topics


Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A key U.S. lawmaker expressed support on Thursday for a proposal by communications regulators to give auction proceeds to broadcasters as an incentive to give up some airwaves highly sought by wireless broadband providers.

Representative Rick Boucher, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet, called the proposal by the Federal Communications Commission "the right approach."

Last week the FCC unveiled its National Broadband Plan, a blueprint aimed at bringing faster Internet speeds to all U.S. households at affordable prices.

The blueprint, which was requested by Congress, also proposes that broadcasters like CBS Corp voluntarily give up some of their airwaves for auction to wireless broadband providers, with broadcasters getting some of the proceeds.

The approach, which would need Congressional approval, would give wireless carriers desperately needed spectrum for their mobile devices, such as the iPhone and Blackberry.

However, in a sign that there could be opposition to the plan, Democrat John Dingell said he was concerned because broadcasters already gave up airwaves during the digital transition, and it could hamper the promotion of diversity and localism.

"Further loss of spectrum can have a very serious adverse affect on the public," Dingell said at the hearing to examine the FCC's broadband plan.

In the plan the FCC is seeking to free 500 megahertz of airwaves for mobile broadband services over the next decade. The agency wants additional authority from Congress to conduct those auctions.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski and wireless companies such as AT&T Inc, Verizon Wireless, Sprint Nextel Corp and T-Mobile, the U.S. unit of Deutsche Telekom AG, have been warning of a looming spectrum crisis. Verizon Wireless is a venture of Verizon Communications Inc and Vodafone Group Plc.

Members of the House panel did not say when they might introduce legislation to expand the FCC's auction authority.

Fred Upton, a Michigan Republican, said committee members are working on auction legislation but also expressed concern that reallocating airwaves could cause harm to consumers and broadcasters.

The FCC is also proposing to auction a section of the airwaves called the "D Block" for commercial purposes. The proceeds of that auction is expected to fund an emergency broadband response network for firefighters, police and other public safety officials.

The chairman of the full committee, Henry Waxman, said he supports using the D Block auction proceeds for building the emergency system, which could cost between $12 billion and $16 billion to build and operate.

(Reporting by John Poirier; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick and Tim Dobbyn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
Vertigo wrote:
These “airwaves,” the ether, are a public trust like the National Forests or the Oceans. Television broadcasters do not own these airwaves, they borrowed them from U.S. via the F.C.C.. Licenses to use these public resources for commercial purposes were traditionally granted with a proviso that their use must serve the “public interest.” The billions of dollars obtained from these auctions should therefore be applied to lowering the national debt rather than aggrandizing the wealth of television broadcasters. Thanks to the recent Supreme Court decision granting unlimited free speech rights to corporations, the broadcaster’s pockets will be relined quickly enough by revenues from an onslaught of corporate sponsored political adverts.

Mar 25, 2010 3:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.