U.S. Army Captain Michael Kelvington, commander of the Battle company, 1-508 Parachute Infantry battalion, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division, bows next to remains of Gulam Dostager, a member of Afghan Local Police who was killed in the blast of an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) during the joint Tor Janda (Black Flag in Pashtu) operation, in Zahri district of Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan May 25, 2012.  REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov  (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: MILITARY CIVIL UNREST CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz (UNITED STATES - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

Fleet Week

The U.S. Navy takes Manhattan for a week.  Slideshow 

Photo

The SpaceX mission

A privately owned unmanned rocket blasts off on a mission to be the first commercial flight to the International Space Station.  Slideshow 

Corporate America weighs in on health law costs

BOSTON/NEW YORK | Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:49am EDT

BOSTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - A pair of top U.S. industrial companies gave some of the first estimates of what the nation's healthcare overhaul will cost them, although an Obama administration official called the moves premature.

Deere & Co and Caterpillar Inc said they were expecting a combined $250 million in charges this year as a result of changes to the $2.5 trillion U.S. healthcare system that President Barack Obama signed into law this week.

But U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke criticized those estimates as premature. The final law is still being tweaked, with the Senate expected to send a revised version of the landmark legislation back to the House of Representatives later on Thursday after eliminating two minor provisions.

"A lot of the regulations on how this will affect big business haven't even published yet, so for them to come out, I think is premature and irresponsible," Locke said in an interview on CNBC business television.

At issue is a provision of the health care reform package that makes a subsidy paid to companies to provide prescription drug coverage to their employees taxable; previously this benefit had not been taxed.

Investors appeared to the take the news in stride, as each company's shares were up about 2 percent, outpacing the broad Standard & Poor's 500 index in late morning trading.

"This is a near-term, quick-hit charge," said Jeff Windau, an industrial analyst at Edward Jones in St. Louis, who follows both Caterpillar and Deere. "A lot of investors are still looking through to the longer-term question of what's the economy doing? There's growth out there and we can handle this one-time charge."

INVESTOR CONFIDENCE

Despite the political furor around the legislation, Windau said many investors may feel confident that companies that just survived the worst recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s will be able to handle a change in the health care system.

"Investors have confidence that they can manage these costs as well," Windau said.

Deere, a maker of farm equipment, said on Thursday it expects its after-tax expenses to rise by about $150 million this year as a result of healthcare reform.

The Moline, Illinois-based company, which expects the bulk of the costs to come in its current second fiscal quarter, had forecast full-year earnings of about $1.3 billion.

Analysts, on average, looked for second fiscal quarter profit of $450.6 million, or $1.06 per share, from Deere with full-year profit forecast at $1.37 billion, or $3.21 per share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

Caterpillar, the world's largest maker of earth-moving equipment, said in a filing with the SEC after the close of trading on Wednesday that it expects to record a $100 million after-tax charge in the first quarter related to the new law.

Analysts, on average, had looked for a first quarter profit at Caterpillar of about $280 million, or 45 cents per share.

Caterpillar and Deere are not the first companies to project their costs related to the reform package, which is high on corporate America's radar since more than 150 million working-age Americans get health benefits from their employers.

Diversified U.S. manufacturer Honeywell International Inc in January estimated that healthcare reform would trim its first quarter earnings by four to five cents per share.

That move -- which came at a time when it was unsure if health care reform would pass at all, let alone what form it would take -- surprised investors, who sent Honeywell shares down despite a fourth-quarter earnings report that topped Wall Street forecasts.

A Honeywell spokesman said on Thursday that the company had not updated the earlier cost estimate and would continue to review the legislation.

(Reporting by Scott Malone and Nick Zieminski; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (20)
HarryO123 wrote:
‘Premature’,?? probably is, actual costs will probably be 3 times the initial estimate.

Mar 25, 2010 1:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Story_Burn wrote:
Caterpillar’s $100 million number seems really high and hard to believe

Mar 25, 2010 1:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
stan0301 wrote:
Here we ;have a good example of chess players that only think one move ahead–In case you didn’t notice, you did not step over any dead bodies on your way to work today–Reason? Everyone HAS health care–it is just that (unique in the world) the rich have been paying for everyone–because for those who pay–they pay roughly TEN TIMES the cost of the service–the Cost of health care ISN’T going to go up (of course the thieves will try)–What we should see is that with everybody paying there will no longer be a need for those with money to pay ten times the cost of the care they receive. What should happen is the PRICE of health care (and insurance) should be able to approach the COST of health care–one for instance to guide you–a MRI should cost about $160—NOT the $1500 ;you are now commonly seeing being billed.

Mar 25, 2010 1:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.